<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.nerve.com/CS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Bangs Are Back</title><link>http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/modernmaterialist/archive/2008/07/17/bangs-are-back.aspx</link><description>Bangs are back, baby. And I have to admit, I think they&amp;#39;re sorta hot. But one company foresees all sorts of problems with bangs being paired with hats, going so far as to say &amp;quot;for many women with bangs, hats are uncomfortable and unattractive</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)</generator><item><title>re: Bangs Are Back</title><link>http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/modernmaterialist/archive/2008/07/17/bangs-are-back.aspx#110401</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:30:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bd485f5c-a45b-491f-8e52-c79e7f680fc3:110401</guid><dc:creator>merrymishaps</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh my. The only thing that would make that hat worse would be if 80s bangs were back ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.nerve.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=110401" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Bangs Are Back</title><link>http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/modernmaterialist/archive/2008/07/17/bangs-are-back.aspx#110321</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 14:43:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bd485f5c-a45b-491f-8e52-c79e7f680fc3:110321</guid><dc:creator>saraswank</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;WOW that's awful! &amp;nbsp;All that woman needs is a fanny pack and she's got quite the runway look going.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.nerve.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=110321" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>