See, Dad? Having Tattoos Does Not Make Me a Drunk Slut.

Posted by Emily Farris

 

Our dad cut us off when we came home from New York at age 19 with a lower back tattoo and a lip piercing. Maybe he thought we were joining the ranks of drunk sluts. And maybe in his day that kind-of reason might have applied. But not anymore. Not too long ago — and today in many circles — tattoed and pierced women were perhaps perceived as a little slutty. Even a recent study found that women with piercings and tattoos were viewed by college students as "more sexually active and more heavily drinking (and less attractive) than their peers. In fact, these students assume women with three tattoos (on the arm, hip, and ankle) chug eight drinks in a night out, versus only four for women with no ink."

Eight?! We'd say more like 5, but anyway...

That theory has been somewhat debunked by the fact that soccer moms sport tattoos (or "tramp stamps") these days — even if they were slutty in college. But a tattoo doesn't make you anything but tattooed.

We think the real point here is that tattoos and piercings don't make us drunk sluts; we were drunk sluts long before we were pierced and tattooed. Not necessarily because we got something(s) pierced or inked when drunk (come on, who hasn't?), but because, as the author of the Psychology Today article pointed out in an email, "sensation seeking and promiscuity are correlated with body modification, and sensation seeking is correlated with alcohol use."

Yes. We like sensation. Don't you? Actually, we love tattoo pain. It's the most empowering kind-of pain as far as we're concerned, probably because it's not very deep and it's self-imposed. 

Do you like tattoo pain? And are you a drunk slut? (Just joking about the slut part.) 

 

[Psychology Today: Your Skin is Your Canvas

[Image


Comments

profrobert said:

Pain hurts.  I take less seriously anyone who tattoos himself or herself.  The more ink, the more ridiculous they look.  It's like going out wearing a dunce cap.

May 16, 2008 7:03 PM

farknerve said:

I've got two tats.  I didn't enjoy the pain, but it was mildly annoying at worst.  I've definitely had worse pain from a paper cut or stubbing my toe.  I have chronic medical problems and sometimes feel like my body is out of my control, so it's my way of saying to my body "I still own you."  

May 16, 2008 7:37 PM

ladette_blues said:

great effin job naming the author of the article

May 16, 2008 9:37 PM

puchinello said:

Staying at the Ritz Carlton in D. recently, coming in just before sundown, I witnessed two stunning(that is, fashion-model), yet older (say, about 30) women of Nordic appearance exiting, dressed v. provocatively, get into a limo sent for them, quickly joined by very serious older, traditional sheiks.  As they passed, I noted identical tats that were discrete, abstract logos, in the same spot on their shoulders.  Marks of the int'l booty trade? Property of.

May 18, 2008 3:48 PM

thinkywritey said:

To call it pain isn't exactly accurate, far as I'm concerned, because pain is something one's body instinctively avoids. I like the sensation of being tattooed and, in fact, would be more than happy to act as a scratchboard, as it were, for an artist if not for the fact that I'm not interested in committing to the art and I scar easily. (I do have two tattoos presently.) However, I'm also a certain sort of masochist, so there you go.

May 19, 2008 2:38 PM

ds said:

Let me guess who was polled: frat boys who are so drunk need visual images to tell who's wild or not. Boys, if they're hanging out in your bar, they're sluts.

May 19, 2008 9:33 PM

About Emily Farris

Emily Farris writes about culture and food for numerous publications and websites you've probably never heard of, including her own blog eefers. Her first cookbook, "Casserole Crazy: Hot Stuff for Your Oven" was published in 2008. Emily recently escaped New York and now lives in a ridiculously large apartment in Kansas City, MO with her cat, but just one... so far.

in