Reason #8,847 Not To Sleep With A Bali Hooker...

Posted by Brian Fairbanks

 

This is one of the most bizarre family custody cases we've ever heard about.

It involves a man, a hooker, a mom, a five-year-old girl, a series of judges, one STD...  and, hopefully, a happy ending... no pun intended...

According to Strollerderby, this is the story of:

1) Man in Australia gets married, his wife has a five-year-old daughter. Daughter contracts an unnamed STD.

2) Wife leaves man, saying he cheated on her and gave the daughter the STD. But how did he give the daughter the STD?

3) Man tells judge: "Hey Judge, it was nothing more than this ol' pro I rented out on vacation in Bali." Judge says: "Suck it, I'm taking your daughter away." (Actual transcripts unavailable.)

4) Man tells appellate court judge, "Dude, I was serious about that ol' pro thing. I think I gave the undisclosed STD to my daughter via a towel we shared one day." Judge: "Yep, that sounds about right" and gives the man custody again. 

5) The internets throw a shitfit:

That a judge would put a child back in the home of a suspected molester without being 100 percent certain is creepy enough. But so is the fact that a number of STDs could easily be passed to a child - even, according to reputable health sources, by a shared towel.

Innocent until proven guilty, people. Of course, the guy deserves at least some punishment for cheating with a hooker in a foreign country while he had a wife and family back home-- when are people going to realize that cheating has major consequences for those around them?

Via Strollerderby.

 

Related:

While You Were Sleeping: Lookin' For Asian Women

"I Seem To Have Forgotten To Bathe For Two Days"

Dear Margo Unsure What Sex Coupons Are

Women Get Away With Affairs Because of Their Expert Lying, Says Woman Who Got Away With An Affair With Future British Prime Minister


Comments

Daniel J Dwyer said:

"Of course, the guy deserves at least some punishment for cheating..."

Sounds a lot like you're suggesting a morality based law, and one restrictive to individual liberty at that. That's really not too different than someone who feels abortion is wrong arguing that anyone who has an one deserves at least some punishment. Laws are supposed to function to protect the life, liberty, and property of all members of a society. They are not there to punish people for behavior you consider immoral. That's a very conservative, unconstitutional viewpoint.

October 3, 2008 6:23 PM

About Brian Fairbanks

Brian Fairbanks, the Senior National Political Correspondent for Nerve, is a filmmaker living in Brooklyn or New Orleans, depending on the season. He is a heavily-armed advocate of gun control.

in