Third-hand Smoke, Seriously? Third-hand?

Posted by Scanner Matt

 

Sometimes we smoke "first-hand". Sometimes we're in the presence of other people's "second-hand" smoke. Now we have "third-hand" smoke. Non-smokers' newest paranoia or genuine threat?

We feel like this study is mostly for the trashy folk who smoke around their own kids, not for people like us, who aren't responsible for anyone but our ourselves and smoke just to look cool.

Anyway, even the stale smell of smoke in that sweater you never wash is toxic.


Science Daily reports:

"When you smoke – anyplace – toxic particulate matter from tobacco smoke gets into your hair and clothing," says lead study author, Jonathan Winickoff, MD, MPH, assistant director of the MGHfC Center for Child and Adolescent Health Policy. "When you come into contact with your baby, even if you're not smoking at the time, she comes in contact with those toxins. And if you breastfeed, the toxins will transfer to your baby in your breastmilk." Winickoff notes that nursing a baby if you're a smoker is still preferable to bottle-feeding, however.

 We weren't expecting that last bit of information.

 

Related:

Presidents Who Smoke: A Photo History

"No Brown M&M's": At Last, The Truth...

New World Resolutions

 

[image]

 


Comments

danrimage said:

It does sound ridiculous, but I've heard this before. Several cot deaths in the UK have been linked to third hand smoke.

December 30, 2008 2:52 PM

solstice2005 said:

It is no small wonder that the human race has managed to thrive for thousand of years without having constant reminders from pointy-headed publicity seekers that life itself is dangerous!  Do you know the most dangerous substance on earth?  Oxygen!  The proof? Any being that breathes it has a 100% probability of dying!

December 30, 2008 2:55 PM

Sarah said:

Even as a non-smoker, I find this just a little ridiculous. I will grant that some babies may have died from contact with smoke toxins.. however, I'm willing to bet that the parents in those cases were the heavy smoking types. You know, completely saturated. Stupid ass people. I dislike smoke, second-hand smoke, all of it... but we can be TOO paranoid.

December 30, 2008 6:36 PM

Hittman said:

Science Daily should remove the word "science" from their name.  This study was nothing more than a phone survey that reported on how many people believe this nonsense.  There was NOTHING in the study about the dangers of THS.  Yet, most "reporters" printed the story either implying or outright stating that the doctor's ridiclous claims were true.  

There is no limit to the depths nicotine nazis will sink to vilify smokers.  This is further proof of their dishonesty.  

www.davehitt.com/.../third-hand-smoke

January 11, 2009 12:19 AM

in