Who Would You Rather: This Week's Newsmaking Naked Mens

Posted by Colleen Kane

 

Many of you have by now seen the "naked" Vanity Fair shoot by Annie Liebowitz, featuring the men they're calling Comedy's New Legends: Paul Rudd, Seth Rogen, Jason Segel, and Jonah Hill. What with the hairless nude suits, the pudge, and the lack of genitalia, they're oddly cherubic.

But have you seen the honest-to-God, bare-ass naked guy who spent most of Sunday on the cross on top of a church?

Sacreligious and probably crazy, but dude is in shape. The full monty shots (forbidden on this blog), can be seen here. 

This man climbed to the top of the cross in Los Angeles, who was up there for almost seven hours, creating a huge scene: disrupting traffic while threatening to jump, and smearing feces on the cross. Firemen and police inflated an air cushion in case he jumped, but the man eventually climbed down on his own accord. According to news reports, he's probably being evaluated at a psychiatric hospital right now.  

Related: 

Who Would You Rather: Seth Rogen vs. Seth Rogen?

Seth Rogen Dipped His Toes in the Sea of Porn, Decided to Go For a Swim

'Playboy' Picks Its Ninth Play Boy


+ DIGG + DEL.ICIO.US + REDDIT
Posted Mar 03 2009, 03:25 PM
Filed under: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Emily Farris said:

Wow! Paul Rudd plays a mean Tom Ford!

I'll still take Seth Rogen, if he promises to grow that beard back and gain 30 pounds.

March 3, 2009 2:31 PM

blondage said:

nudity is forbidden on this blog? WTF?

March 3, 2009 3:53 PM

asb76 said:

Why is nudity forbidden now?

March 3, 2009 4:49 PM

Colleen Kane said:

Not all nudity, however, that ever-controversial male full monty is.

March 3, 2009 6:49 PM

totalblamblam said:

Poop-cross-guy is a total babe.

I've always been partial to Paul. Paul with Jason's height/ body would be ideal.

March 3, 2009 8:53 PM

thinkywritey said:

So what's the rule then? Boobs are okay, but male genitalia is a no-no? And presumably female genitalia is similarly verboten? If you tell me that female full-frontals are allowed, but males' aren't, I am instantaneously going to stop reading this blog (and site) forever.

March 4, 2009 10:06 AM

jane said:

Seth Rogen or Paul Rudd.  Is this photograph a study of a previous cover or photograph or painting? If so, which one?

March 4, 2009 10:30 AM

Emily Farris said:

No genitals or pubes (from any sex) are allowed anymore. Boobs are. Men's and women's! For the record: we absolutely didn't write these rules, we just have to follow them so we can continue to pay our rent. And if you stop reading, we're going to have a really hard time paying our rent.

March 4, 2009 10:41 AM

thinkywritey said:

I understand. I didn't figure it was your choice, actually. But if The Rule was no men, but women were allowed, I'd have more respect for someone for choosing not to use either. I'm still reading. :) I know, you're so relieved.

March 4, 2009 1:27 PM

About Colleen Kane

Colleen has been an editor at BUST and Playgirl magazines and has written for the endangered species of dead-tree magazines like SPIN and Plenty, as well as Radar Online and other websites. She lives in exile in Baton Rouge with her fiance, two dogs, and her former cat. Read her personal blogs at ColleenKane.com.

in