http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/scanner/archive/2008/08/08/jim-beam-peeping-tom-ad-too-naughty-even-for-australia.aspxMan... Jim Beam thinks he can go on over to Australia, where no one shaves any part of their body and topless whores fornicate with eight-year-old cigar-chomping schoolboys in broad daylight, and just ram their arrogant American pseudo-comedy down theenCommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/scanner/archive/2008/08/08/jim-beam-peeping-tom-ad-too-naughty-even-for-australia.aspx#120271Sun, 24 Aug 2008 16:17:23 GMTbd485f5c-a45b-491f-8e52-c79e7f680fc3:120271Chuck<p>That's retarded. Replacing &quot;thing&quot; with &quot;thing&quot; is just as nonsensical as the original. You only think it makes since because you use the same word twice. Now &quot;you have another thought coming&quot; WOULD make sense. </p> <img src="http://www.nerve.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=120271" width="1" height="1">http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/scanner/archive/2008/08/08/jim-beam-peeping-tom-ad-too-naughty-even-for-australia.aspx#117311Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:29:35 GMTbd485f5c-a45b-491f-8e52-c79e7f680fc3:117311grammarasshole<p>Despite what Judas Priest and most of the world's English-speaking population seem to think, the phrase is, &quot;if you think (insert opponent's mistaken thought here), then you have another think coming.&quot; Not another &quot;thing&quot; coming.</p> <p>You see, that way, it actually makes sense.</p> <p>;-)</p> <img src="http://www.nerve.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=117311" width="1" height="1">