<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.nerve.com/CS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Wikipedia's Got Porn On It?</title><link>http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/scanner/archive/2008/05/08/wikipedia-s-got-porn-on-it.aspx</link><description>Apparently people are getting pissed that Wikipedia -- the first encyclopedia composed entirely of committe-approved electronic conjecture -- has entries for things like &amp;quot;fluffer&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;striptease&amp;quot; (pictured above). Come on, folks,</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)</generator><item><title>re: Wikipedia's Got Porn On It?</title><link>http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/scanner/archive/2008/05/08/wikipedia-s-got-porn-on-it.aspx#92715</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:28:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bd485f5c-a45b-491f-8e52-c79e7f680fc3:92715</guid><dc:creator>Erin O'Brien</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Go to the entry for clitoris, baby.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.nerve.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=92715" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Wikipedia's Got Porn On It?</title><link>http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/scanner/archive/2008/05/08/wikipedia-s-got-porn-on-it.aspx#91659</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:20:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bd485f5c-a45b-491f-8e52-c79e7f680fc3:91659</guid><dc:creator>britishintellect</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As I recall, the entry for pearl necklace has a similarly interesting picture.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.nerve.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=91659" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>