Scanner
Your daily cup of WTF?
ScreenGrab
The Nerve Film Blog
Slice
Each month a new artist; each image a new angle. This month: Giovanni Cervantes.
ScreenGrab
The Nerve Film Blog
Autumn
A fashionable L.A. photo editor exploring all manner of hyper-sexual girls down south.
The Modern Materialist
Almost everything you want.
Paper Airplane Crush
A San Francisco photographer on the eternal search for the girls of summer.
Rose & Olive
Houston neighbors pull back the curtains and expose each other's lives.
chase
The creator of Supercult.com poses his pretty posse.
The Remote Island
Nerve's TV blog.
61 Frames Per Second
Smarter gaming.

The Screengrab

(Belated) Take Five: Stephen King

Posted by Peter Smith
So, have you heard of this Stephen King fellow? Apparently he’s pretty widely read. Hs popularity as a novelist is matched only by his profligacy — he’s written over thirty novels and hundreds of short stories on his way to becoming one of the best-selling authors of all time. This level of popularity is like heroin to Hollywood producers, and adaptations of his books and stories — as well as original screenplays by King himself, an inveterate movie nerd — have led to an astonishing 100+ films and television shows. Like their source material, though, they’re a decidedly mixed bag: for every Shawshank Redemption, there’s a Children of the Corn 666: Isaac’s Return. And just as King enjoys a decidedly muddled critical reception, films made from his works, while occasionally made by talented filmmakers who find in the material the bones of something great, tend towards third-rate exploitation horror. Still, with The Mist having opened last week, it’s good to remember that a number of genuinely worthwhile projects have made the translation from the mind of King to the big screen. Here are five of the best. 

CARRIE (1976) 

The first hint that Stephen King’s novels might be the stuff of memorable movies came in 1976, when Brian DePalma got hold of his tale of a shy, stunted teenage girl who happened to have vast telekinetic powers. As the rest of this list will make clear, it’s no secret that King’s books tended to make good films only in the hands of a competent director, but DePalma in particular blew the doors off of this one, picking out the meaty insides and discarding the extraneous baggage. Ratcheting up the tension of King’s patented adolescent-angst narrative and turning the end into something beyond gore and well into Grand Guignol territory, DePalma also delivers one of the best jump-out-of-your-seat shocks in horror movie history near the end of Carrie. 

SALEM'S LOT (1979) 

The story of a small town infested by vampires was one of King’s first big successes as a novelist, and this TV movie adaptation — helmed by horror maven and Texas Chainsaw Massacre director Tobe Hooper — does a terrific job conveying its sense of paranoia and night terror without resorting to gore or cheap thrills. Indeed, working within the restrictions of television seemed to suit Hooper and screenwriter Paul Monash, who paced and teased the moments of shock out quite effectively. They’re also aided greatly by a cast crammed full of top-shelf character actors, including Elisha Cook Jr., Fred Willard, James Mason, Ed Flanders and George Dzundza. 

THE SHINING (1980) 

Not a lot of genuinely great directors have taken on the works of Stephen King, but Stanley Kubrick was unquestionably the greatest. Made only three years after the publication of the novel, The Shining is a work of genuine genius, containing one of Jack Nicholson’s greatest screen performances, some absolutely tremendous camerawork, and a sense of creeping horror that’s absent in many of the plodding, obvious shock films made from King's work. (Amazingly, the best-ever movie adaptation of a Stephen King novel was one of King’s least favorites; he later helped a far-inferior TV movie reworking into existence.) 

CREEPSHOW (1982) 

In a perfectly wonderful and appropriate twist of fate, one of Stephen King’s best friends is zombie auteur George Romero, and while Creepshow, their only true collaboration (King wrote the screenplay and Romero directed) isn’t the best movie based on the horror writer’s works, it’s easily the most enjoyable. The two sought to recreate the goofy, gory tone of the EC horror comics they had both enjoyed in their youth, and they succeeded to an admirable degree — and if the overall feel of the movie, as well as a hysterically nutty performance by King himself, are any indication, they had a hell of a time doing it. 

THE DEAD ZONE (1983)

The story of a man who can see the future, and whether or not he has the chance to alter it, is a pretty whoozy old trope in science fiction, and to be honest, it doesn’t fare all that much better even in the hands of a man who, like Stephen King, can lend a patina of respectability to even the hoariest stock plots. David Cronenberg does what he can with the material he has, but it’s not the script or the direction that makes The Dead Zone worth watching: it’s the lead performances, most especially Christopher Walken (sublimely nutty as usual) in the role of the seer and Martin Sheen (hamming it up like nobody’s business) as a politician he suspects may someday trigger a nuclear war.

— Leonard Pierce 
+ DIGG + DEL.ICIO.US + REDDIT
Posted Nov 26 2007, 04:00 PM
Filed under: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Buck Theorem said:

"Creepshow" - one of the best openings ever that perfectly embodies the sheer expectation of the horror fan (ghoul cackles; kid gleefully punches his fist into his hand with dark anticipation).

"The Shining" - a film that distills all King's cartoonish excesses into the lead actor, and then gets on with the real scary stuff elsewhere. It improves with each watch, its precision increasingly impresses and remains enigmatic and disturbing.

"Salem's Lot" - the best TV horror ever? If not, has to be prime candidate for the scariest.

"Carrie" - over-rated, though probably one of those to set the template for the teencore horror that now dominates the genre.

"The Dead Zone" - probably over-rated; good film, great Walken but minor Cronenberg.

But personal opinion aside, these choices are spot-on. This was fun! Oh, and "Cujo" is under-rated too.

November 28, 2007 11:33 AM

in
Send rants/raves toscreengrab@nerve.com

Archives

  • May 2009 (183)
  • April 2009 (205)
  • March 2009 (190)
  • February 2009 (166)
  • January 2009 (172)
  • December 2008 (179)
  • November 2008 (128)
  • October 2008 (188)
  • September 2008 (150)
  • August 2008 (168)
  • July 2008 (133)
  • June 2008 (146)
  • May 2008 (241)
  • April 2008 (243)
  • March 2008 (200)
  • February 2008 (210)
  • January 2008 (237)
  • December 2007 (132)
  • November 2007 (122)
  • October 2007 (106)

    • Bloggers

    • Paul Clark
    • John Constantine
    • Vadim Rizov
    • Phil Nugent
    • Leonard Pierce
    • Scott Von Doviak
    • Andrew Osborne
    • Hayden Childs
    • Sarah Sundberg
    • Nick Schager
    • Lauren Wissot

    Contributors

    • Kent M. Beeson
    • Pazit Cahlon
    • Bilge Ebiri
    • D.K. Holm
    • Faisal A. Qureshi
    • Vern
    • Bryan Whitefield
    • Scott Renshaw
    • Gwynne Watkins

    Tags

    Browse All Tags

    Places to Go

    People To Read

    Film Festivals

    Directors

    Partners

    College Humor
    The Onion
    Cracked.com
    Fark.com
    Ask Men
    Heavy.com