Screengrab Review: "The Incredible Hulk"

Posted by Scott Von Doviak

As one of the few defenders of Ang Lee's 2003 Hulk – and as someone who picked The Incredible Hulk to be the biggest bomb of this summer – I readily admit to having some preconceived notions about Transporter director Louis Leterrier's take on the latest Marvel comics adaptation. This would be the part where I tell you how pleasantly surprised I was to be proven wrong…but unfortunately, that didn't happen.

The big question all along about The Incredible Hulk has been: What is it? Is it a sequel to the Ang Lee movie? A remake? It's sort of neither, which turns out to be the cleverest aspect of Leterrier's movie. As the opening credits roll, we see a montage of scenes from a previous Hulk movie that never existed. A Hulk origin sequence closer to the 1970s TV show than either the comics or the previous movie plays out as Dr. Bruce Banner (Edward Norton) uses himself as a guinea pig in an experiment with high-level gamma radiation. We know what happens, so why dwell on it? Within two minutes, Banner has Hulked out, smashed up the lab, destroyed his relationship with fellow scientist Betty Ross (Liv Tyler) and pissed off her father General “Thunderbolt” Ross (William Hurt), who vows to pursue him to the ends of the earth. It’s as if Letterier is saying, “Let’s just pretend we all saw this movie and be done with it.” And really, that’s perfectly in keeping with the Hulk’s Marvel comics universe, where new writers and artists are constantly taking over his story and retroactively tweaking his origins.

As the story proper begins, Banner has been on the run for five years. Now working in a Brazilian bottling plant, Banner has learned to keep the Hulk under wraps with a few simple deep breathing exercises. His serenity doesn’t last, as General Ross and his troops – including British commando Emil Blonsky (Tim Roth)
track him down and unleash the beast within Banner. The Hulk escapes but the hunt continues, pretty much for the rest of the movie. In order to boost his chances against the green goliath, Blonsky undergoes a series of injections that promise to transform him into a super-soldier. Banner reunites with Betty, who helps him find Samuel Sterns (Tim Blake Nelson), a genetic scientist who may be able to cure him. Instead, Sterns ends up transforming Blonksy into the Abomination, an even bigger, uglier mass of roid-rage than the Hulk.

As expected, The Incredible Hulk is louder, faster and more action-packed than the 2003 version. Every twenty minutes or so, Ross and his goons show up and there’s another big battle. (The most entertaining one, in which Ross keeps escalating the level of artillery to no avail, almost plays like a Monty Python sketch.) By the end, when the Hulk and Abomination are going mano-a-mano in the streets of New York, the movie resembles less a Marvel comic than an updated King Kong vs. Godzilla – you’re basically aware you’re just watching one big slab of pixels punching the crap out of another big slab of pixels. The Hulk actually looks pretty good most of the time, especially if it’s dark or raining. The humans don’t come off quite as well. I’m willing to bet this isn’t the cut Edward Norton had in mind, but that’s okay – I didn’t need a lot more Banner torment in my life. Roth doesn’t do much but glower, Tyler’s role is even more thankless than the Jennifer Connelly version of same, and when it comes to mustachioed generals, William Hurt is no Sam Elliott.

Leterrier does try to provide a little something for everyone. There are inside references for the comic book fans, geeky cameos by Stan Lee, Lou Ferrigno, and someone else who is supposed to be a surprise, except that his appearance is all over the TV ads in what smells like a desperate marketing stunt, and jokes about stretchy purple pants. (The best gag involves Norton’s mangling of the signature “You wouldn’t like me when I’m angry” line.) And we finally get to hear that immortal call to action, “HULK SMASH!” There’s even a brief stab at Ang Lee’s more lyrical, haunting tone as the Hulk broods on a cliff in a rainstorm. But the whole thing plays like it’s been focus-grouped to death, stripped of any real personality of its own. It may not end up being the biggest bomb of the summer – stuff does blow up real good, after all – but despite hints of another sequel, it provides no compelling reason for the Hulk’s big screen career to continue.

Related:
Hulk Smash?
The Summer of Super-Duds


Comments

eurrapanzy said:

i'll admit, i'm intrigued.  i liked it better as a think piece with violence, but i occasionally love stupid explosions.  i'll see it.

June 13, 2008 10:16 AM

adam christ said:

who cares if the movie is garbage, i'd watch two hours of the hulk doing pushups.  

looking forward to a ridiculous hulk/spiderman/x-men/avengers/fantastic four megacrossover in the near future.  

June 13, 2008 11:24 AM

Don said:

Typical critic idiocy.  The 2003 version was trash.  An opening montage a la the 1978-1982 TV show is all anyone needs to know about how the Hulk got to be the Hulk.  Get on with the story already.  The whole "origin story" thing is a colossal bore.  Batman Returns was on TV the other night and it was a snoozefest.  Everyone knows Bruce Wayne is Batman, Clark Kent is Superman and Bruce Banner is the Hulk.  Get on with the action already.  Misbegotten origen stories are why the part 2 is always better than the part one.  Part 2 isn't weighed down by heaps of boring, useless exposition.

June 13, 2008 7:49 PM

Scott Von Doviak said:

Gee, and here I thought I praised the opening montage. I should read my own stuff more carefully.

June 13, 2008 8:28 PM

adam christ said:

don smash!!

don no like lengthy origen (!?) montage!!

don say sequels always better than originals, yet in same breath say batman returns is snoozefest!!  don woefully inconsistent!!

June 14, 2008 8:21 AM

token said:

The reason the HULK movies aren't very successful [as movies...perhaps they made decent money] is that The Hulk just isn't a very interesting character.  We've seen lots and lots of unkillable, unstoppable movie monsters that go around smashing things, and nobody is very interested in a movie where Dr. Banner sits around sulking, or the Hulk sits around mooning over Betty Ross.  The story potential well here was never very deep, and has pretty well dried up.

June 15, 2008 11:42 AM

Paul said:

Wrong about the story drying up, Token. Go see the movie. The ending opens up a whole new, much cooler side of the Hulk/Banner dynamic that should have worked even better than it did in the comics (it was still better than the dumb regular Hulk stuff). Part III (II-a?) will be awesome. Can't wait. Also the Avengers will be amazing -- IF they go teh Ultimates route, rather than traditional Avengers.

June 16, 2008 7:29 PM

in