http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/screengrab/archive/2008/06/13/when-good-directors-go-bad-hulk-2003-ang-lee.aspxIn recent years, as “sequel” and “remake” have become dirty words in the minds of moviegoers, Hollywood studios have scrambled to come up with new, less offensive alternatives. How many blockbusters based on previously-adapted properties have been taggedenCommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/screengrab/archive/2008/06/13/when-good-directors-go-bad-hulk-2003-ang-lee.aspx#101363Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:09:54 GMTbd485f5c-a45b-491f-8e52-c79e7f680fc3:101363Krauthammer<p>Agree 100% (although I think I enjoyed the split frames a bit more than you did) it's certainly a failure, but it's an honest failure, and I don't begrudge Lee for it. I've never been a fan of the Hulk, but I've always loved the idea, of years of pent-up anger from Mr. Banner unleashed in all its glory. Lee tried some of that I think, but I don't have much hope for the new one.</p> <img src="http://www.nerve.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=101363" width="1" height="1">http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/screengrab/archive/2008/06/13/when-good-directors-go-bad-hulk-2003-ang-lee.aspx#101360Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:56:26 GMTbd485f5c-a45b-491f-8e52-c79e7f680fc3:101360Cestleroot<p>I have absolutely no interest in The Incredible Hulk...that said, the more I hear about the new Hulk film the more intrigued I get about Ang Lee's interpretation...this weekend I'm totally going to go back and give Ang Lee's Hulk another look. And ignore the new Hulk entirely.</p> <img src="http://www.nerve.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=101360" width="1" height="1">