<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.nerve.com/CS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>When Good Directors Go Bad:  Cruising (1980, William Friedkin)</title><link>http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/screengrab/archive/2008/10/07/when-good-directors-go-bad-cruising-1980-william-friedkin.aspx</link><description>Usually, when I watch a potential When Good Directors Go Bad title, I’m pretty sure of how I feel about it. Generally, it’ll be a movie I already know that I dislike, or one that I’ve heard enough negative things about that I’m almost positive I’ll join</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)</generator><item><title>re: When Good Directors Go Bad:  Cruising (1980, William Friedkin)</title><link>http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/screengrab/archive/2008/10/07/when-good-directors-go-bad-cruising-1980-william-friedkin.aspx#134497</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:36:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bd485f5c-a45b-491f-8e52-c79e7f680fc3:134497</guid><dc:creator>privateivan</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;a character lubes up his entire forearm&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That guy was Bruno Kirby! (although it's not mentioned on either his or the film's IMDB pages)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.nerve.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=134497" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: When Good Directors Go Bad:  Cruising (1980, William Friedkin)</title><link>http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/screengrab/archive/2008/10/07/when-good-directors-go-bad-cruising-1980-william-friedkin.aspx#134416</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:36:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bd485f5c-a45b-491f-8e52-c79e7f680fc3:134416</guid><dc:creator>borstalboy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Your comments, Mr. Clark, perfectly sum up how I feel about this movie. &amp;nbsp;It's crap, but its crap I have somehow managed to watch about three times. &amp;nbsp;It's also, for all its confusion and visual ugliness, undeniably a Friedkin film. &amp;nbsp;He's certainly &amp;quot;gone bad&amp;quot; on much bigger scale than this one (DEAL OF THE CENTURY, THE GUARDIAN).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was so disappointed by the DVD re-release, though! &amp;nbsp;The extras feel weak and Friedkin's commentary offers so few revelations one rather wonders why he even bothered. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.nerve.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=134416" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>