SXSW Review: “New World Order”

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Scott Von Doviak — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:34:48 GMT

As the folks with actual functioning brains have already figured out, I did not post that last comment attributed to me. You can tell because it does not link to my Nerve profile. Please resume your regularly scheduled paranoia.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

David Cox — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:30:14 GMT

Hey r said:

You piece of sh*t. You're probably the same person that wrote that anonymous hit piece on Rense.com. My gut tells me you're one of those government trolls that surfs comment boards spreading disinformation. Keep living under rocks and scurrying away from the light...

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Hayden Childs — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:14:20 GMT

Wow, I had no idea that they'd let just any old sheeple into Film Analysis 101 For Boneheads And Probably Assholes, Too. I figured you would have to be a high-ranking member of the GOBLINS (that's Global Organization for Berating on-Line Individuals at Nerve Santa Sudafed SXSW System, Sucka MC).

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Phil Nugent — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:20:39 GMT

I call dibs on reviewing this thing when the DVD comes out!

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Chris Mitchell — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:42:09 GMT

OK, scotty . . . I get it. You LIKE being one of the "assholes". It's your highest aspiration. Congratulations, bub. You're a smashing success.

If you ever decide to be a serious film critic, Film Analysis 101 (for boneheads, and probably assholes, too) schools critics in asserting opinions and supporting them with crystal clear examples of the film they're panning. You definitely lack that know-how if your F- critique (above) is any indication. But, then again, assholes don't have to be competent critics. Do they? Diarrhea of the mouth is enough. Incontinence is more your "asshole" style.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Scott Von Doviak — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:56:46 GMT

There is no way to get through to assholes like me. Because I am so smart. I don't need to do anymore research because I know it all.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Reynolds Wrap Haberdasher — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:27:49 GMT

I was waiting for someone to pull out the unironic usage of the word "sheeple", and I was not disappointed.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

adam christ — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:20:04 GMT

holy crap! i'm gonna start selling ad space on a a blog that does nothing but photoshop penises onto alex jones pictures. 1 million pageviews here i come!

seriously though, i accidentally deleted the email from colonel sanders - where's this month's Pentaverate meeting?

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Hayden Childs — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:58:19 GMT

Brother Scott: Lest ye forget, at the last Illuminati meeting, Brother Barack requested no mention of the ilitary-may industrial-way omplex-cay in any forum where Alex-way Ones-Jay and his all-too-clever followers could read it. They're too close to the truth!

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:05:05 GMT

www.rense.com/.../plainsight.htm

Alex Jones may be the kingpin of NWO-hired truth tellers, though he's not overtly affiliated with mainstream news. But he's got a huge listening audience and almost a cult following now, which are big red flags. And his followers, most of whom are good Patriots, erroneously think things will somehow be OK as long as Alex voices what they're thinking. They don't realize what is being done to them and their cause of liberty in causing them to be satisfied with vicarious venting from a supposedly representative voice.

***

I believe that Jones would be more credible to the reviewer if he weren't so darned arrogant, self-absorbed, rude, and melodramatic.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Chris Mitchell — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:57:59 GMT

scotty boy is either blind or stupid. When presented facts (and BTW, facts = TRUTH), scotty dives into delusional denial.

Way to shirk bona fide journalistic integrity, there, scotty. Launch ad homenim attacks against realists. That'll do it! Debunk their proof with your vitriol. Works everytime in the minds of delusionals like you.

You're, at best, a clueless idiot. At worst, you're a 'useful idiot' -- a tool, a propagandic mouthpiece of the 'New World Order' (NWO). Somehow bought-off to further poison the minds (???) of We The Extremely Dumbed-Down American Sheeple.

You abuse your gift for writing. Your competent use of the English language means you have more than 1 functioning brain cell. Put them to good use on better & higher purposes ~ such as researching valid & PROVABLE claims about the self-deified global-elitist hegemony.

NOTE: I didn't conclude this by being an Alex Jones disciple. I did my own research since 10/2001. I read lots of criminal godvernment's documents/schemes as well as those of their NGO partners. Alex Jones read waaaaay more than me. Smart researchers rightly conclude NWO attacks are real. Only since 1/2008 have I listened to Alex. He confirms -in greater detail- my research findings.

The NWO is a pack of life-sucking GHOULS in every sense. They comprise a Globalist Hegemony of Oligarchic Utopianists & Licentious Satanic Supremacists (i.e., GHOULS). They're real. They're Pure Evil. They're screwing up Earth as you know it. They're brilliant at doing that. The "utopia" they plot for We The Severely Victimized American People is eternal enslavement;

*economically - debt, financial ruin & destitution without escape;

*physically - Draconian confinement, escape barriers & kill zones, very limited travel;

*emotionally - they destroy family unity, bonding, romance & love -- with "scientific procreation"; and

*spiritually - GHOULS' criminal godvernment is making itself god; incessantly attacking God Almighty.

This has been their life's works for generations . . . Yes, they're transgenerational.

Study them earnestly. Learn the TRUTH. Change your tune accordingly. Stop polluting some blog(s) with your not even half-baked crud. Use your writing skill for Good instead of evilly spewing misinformation. OK?

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Rara — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:34:41 GMT

Ehahaha! What a piece of shit. No one's on your side, Scott, you ignoramus. You're just an old dog that won't learn anything new and can't even write a constructive criticism. So, you're biased against those people -- that's all your blog says. You have expressed a total misconception of what those people believe and have no understanding of why they hold their beliefs.

Oh, and our lives are important; maybe not yours -- there's always exceptions -- but the majority of us do value human life and see its preservation and the prevailing of humanity as something to strive for.

The people like Alex, Luke, Seth, Bermas and all the other average people who listen to them and research this stuff aren't trying to be heroes or feel self-righteous and important, they have discovered things that aren't right and are taking responsibility. There is a lot of camaraderie that develops from sharing such a passion, but I'm sure they would rather none of the things that they fear be true in the slightest. I'm sure they would rather not be in the spotlight and would prefer just live normal, peaceful lives with their friends and families -- they want the American dream; not the New World Order.

And it is no wonder youngsters like Rudowski & Jackson didn't think of global politics before 9/11. Rudowski would be about my age and I was only 16 on 9/11. So what kid would be researching global politics? You're 41 and you still have no inclination towards the subject.

Hitler may be considered the personification of tyranny and corruption, but it didn't commit suicide when he did.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

David Cox — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 04:52:33 GMT

Are you kidding me? And I suppose you believe when Paulson told the world that the first bailout would fix all our problems? And you believe when Bush said that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction? Typical journalism of this day, ignorant and lacking any elbow grease. Sniper journalism. Why don't you put down your latte, set your blackberry aside, turn off the tube, and do some real journalistic work.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Scott Von Doviak — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:48:34 GMT

Thanks, everyone. I get a bonus for the most commented post of the month, and my check from the military industrial complex didn't show up this week, so I do appreciate all your help.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

bofors — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:42:59 GMT

Luke Myer and Andrew Neel were on The Alex Jones Show today.

They talked about how bad this review is detailed and one of them, Luke or Andrew, said this review made him "pissed."

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

victory2007 — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:52:42 GMT

I agree with the vast majority of the reviewers...what a piece of crap review! If you are going to do a hit piece, at least put a little bit of effort into researching tangible evidence as to why you think Alex and his viewers are delusional. I may not agree with everything Alex says or does but he puts the documents and sources where his mouth is and has huge heart for finding out the truth! Certainly the same can't be said for you...perhaps you should actually read the Constitution, learn about monetary policy and how the Federal Reserve's illegal creation of fiat currency is destroying our economy, and try to educate yourself as to the atrocities the global elite Bilderberg scum are currently waging against not only our citizens, but have historically been doing imperialistically around the world for decades and decades. It isn't a Democratic vs. Republican issues...it is a human issue, and we all are affected. WAKE THE F*&K UP!!!

I am greatly encouraged by the VAST amount of open mindedness I see not only in the reviews here, but also in how receptive people have been to 'The Obama Deception' movie...which is awesome by the way! Not like Mr. Scott would ever take the time to check it out.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Aaron — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:01:22 GMT

This looks like a hit piece. I guess we know who signs Mr. Scott Von Doviak cheques,the federal reserve,military industrial complex....

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Leena — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:47:52 GMT

Mr. Scott Von Doviak

You don't know shit....you're retarded----You're a MORON

Everyone check out OBAMA Deception and then check out you're stock portfolio Mr.Von Doffus...

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

andrew — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:44:26 GMT

full of shit crap review.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Phil Nugent — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:24:27 GMT

"Make sure he/she knows a good english which is an indicator of a reliable reference."

Okay, THAT made my day.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Allison Bricker — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:51:56 GMT

March 17th, 2009

Mr. Scott Von Doviak:

Your gut level rejection of research so contrary to what we are told through the old-media, talking heads, etcetera is completely understandable.

I too refused to look at anything of such seeming hyperbole for many years. Finally, a friend who pestered me ad nauseum convinced me to watch just 10 minutes of the film "WACO: Rules of Engagement". To say it was a devastating documentary is an understatement. The documentary went on to win an Emmy and received an Oscar nomination. It was entirely depressing to think our government was capable of such atrocity.

Additionally, with the leaked "Missouri Information Analysis Center" report, which attempts to put Ron Paul supporters, those against the banker bailouts, et al on par with white supremacist and abortion clinic bombers, it is obvious our inherent liberties are indeed in danger.

Is Mr. Jones a bit over the top, absolutely, but his passion for trying to spread what he feels is an urgent message in no way justifies authoring an article which takes the low road by trashing his appearance in an attempt to dismiss the information he dispense.

Alternative points of view, radical opposition, are all necessary as a guard against a tyrannical government. Does this mean everything he says is spot on? I could not answer this question unequivocally without risking my own credibility. However, my suggestion would be to at least research at length in order to both educate ones self and to either confirm or deny the statements, in lieu of engaging in outright character assassination.

Respectfully,

Allison Bricker

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

ben — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:12:55 GMT

This is the most Bias hit piece review I've ever seen. New World Order was not a hit piece. Unlike your pathetic attempt to review such a film. Your Bias and lack an actual critique simply implies you do not know what your talking about. Nice try but you fail.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

me — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:04:10 GMT

Hey Scott Von Doviak.

what a piece of trash review.

I have a hard time believing you actually watched the movie.

what a joke.

all you have to offer (over the years) is a piece of crap film called "What I Like About You" . jealousy is for the weak minded my friend.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

UseYourFreadom — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:02:44 GMT

Well if you're young and history was boring for you what's in your mind is an illusional present...

Get contact with some old people from excomunist countries and they'll explain a lot of similarities. Make sure he/she knows a good english which is an indicator of a reliable reference.

You can NOT imagine how easy is to become a number that can at any time be deleated from the database...

I hope (really!) that your optimizm has some truth but ...

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Joshua Smith — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:56:27 GMT

Message To Scott Von Doviak:

If you were given five or six good documentaries to watch would you do so?

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Jonathan — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:55:47 GMT

Wow, I guess living in Austin as a failed actor makes one a bit bitter. While "Apocalypse Bop" gives this author some serious street credibility; this isn't even a review of the film, this article only amounts to a personal attack on a celebrity in the author's town. Pitiful.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Johnny Newt — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:53:48 GMT

I certainly hope i have a lot in common with Jones, Rudowski, Jackson and the rest. I would much rather prefer to be on the fringe than amoung the sleeping minions like Van Doviak here. i also couldn't help but notice how this seems more like a personal diatribe against Alex Jones and his fellow patriots than an actual movie review. speaking of personal attacks Scott your a good bit puffy yourself !

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

blog hater — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:45:54 GMT

Alex Jones is no quack..he may get angry once and awhile...but he has proven his stuff. OBAMA DECEPTION NEEDS TO BE CHECKED OUT BY EVERYBODY..it is true folks wake up

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

asdf — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:38:05 GMT

Your review sucks. I was THERE outside the Bilderberg Conference and it was crawling with intelligence agents. Were you there? Or do you just live in your yuppie nerve.com world? Good luck in the collapse, I hope all your money is not in a 401k.

re: SXSW Review: “New World Order”

Joshua Smith — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:30:48 GMT

If you spent any good length of time researching New World Order topics (such as 9/11) you would not be saying these people are delusional. If you spent any good length of time researching New World Order topics (such as 9/11) you would be on their side. If you think otherwise you simply are not aware of much.

If you gave an informed New World Order "conspiracy theorist" one full weekend to explain, illustrate and watch a few good documentaries you would change you song fairly quickly.