<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.nerve.com/CS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>When Good Directors Go Bad: Year of the Horse (1997, Jim Jarmusch)</title><link>http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/screengrab/archive/2008/04/04/when-good-directors-go-bad-year-of-the-horse-1997-jim-jarmusch.aspx</link><description>For almost three decades now, Jim Jarmusch has been one of the heroes of American independent cinema. The deadpan humor and multicultural vibe of his best works have influenced directors worldwide, and his maverick sensibility has practically defined</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)</generator><item><title>re: When Good Directors Go Bad: Year of the Horse (1997, Jim Jarmusch)</title><link>http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/screengrab/archive/2008/04/04/when-good-directors-go-bad-year-of-the-horse-1997-jim-jarmusch.aspx#84380</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 02:13:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bd485f5c-a45b-491f-8e52-c79e7f680fc3:84380</guid><dc:creator>blue23</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This could have just as easily been Ghost Dog or Broken Flowers both unexplainably terrible films from Jarmusch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.nerve.com/CS/aggbug.aspx?PostID=84380" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>