Not a member? Sign up now
|
|
|||||
|
Have a question? Email erin@nerve.com. Letters may be edited for length, content and clarity.
Dear Rabbit Run, Your girlfriend may be a sexual dynamo, but she's lousy at biting her tongue. It's okay to love your vibrator. Mine often appears in my "Ten Things I'm Grateful For" weekly journal entry, but I'd never put Pinky (yes, I like to anthropomorphize) in direct competition with a partner. For one, it's not fair. Mechanical- and human-induced orgasms are apples and oranges. Pinky may deliver more in terms of consistency, but he's a one-trick show. Also, Pinky can't respond to commands, engage in role play or whisper filthy nothings. Nor can he take me to the Frick Collection, cook dinner when I'm on deadline or make fun of Antiques Roadshow.
|
I've been seeing a kind, friendly man for about a month and a half. While I like him as a person and appreciate his generosity and warmth, we have a definite intellectual disparity, which is becoming more evident as time goes on. I don't mean to come off as snobbish or egotistical — I certainly don't consider myself a genius — but I'd appreciate more spirited conversation and wish he possessed a bit more zip. The problem, aside from my terrible guilt over judging him, is that I do enjoy his company and think he's very nice. Is it wrong to continue seeing him for these reasons, knowing that I may grow more irritated with him as time wears on? Or should I break it off now? — Zippity Do Don't
Dear Zippity Do Don't,
Let me tell you about something I call the "Paper Test" and how it's made me rethink everything I thought I knew about guys.
Every Sunday morning I like to do two things: 1. Eat bacon and 2. Read periodicals. While I'm perfectly content doing these activities alone, like origami and salsa dancing, they're more fun with a partner. But not just any partner. Said partner has to be good at these activities. You'd think reading the New York Times and shoveling pork into your mouth would be easy, but not everyone measures up. Enter the Paper Test, which usually comes into play at my favorite brunch spot, on the first Sunday following an adult, overnight sleepover.
Here's a breakdown of Paper Test scoring, which ranges from 5 (best) to 1 (worst).
5 Guy reads and discusses stories in paper, expresses intelligent thoughts on a range of issues, proactively offers to share his bacon, makes a multitude of hilarious and/or inappropriate comments.
4 Same as above, but with no bacon offer and slightly fewer hilarious and/or inappropriate comments.
3 Reads paper in silence, but offers an opinion if solicited. Requests turkey bacon instead of regular, then launches into boring speech about its benefits when informed the restaurant does not offer it.
2 Picks up front section of paper and loses interest after cursory glance. Makes point of looking at my bacon and announcing he's vegetarian, followed by, "But I'm not judging!" Spends the rest of the time staring off into space, sighing loudly and stacking coffee creamers.
1 Claims paper is "full of lies and propaganda" and that he gets his news from underground, anarcho-communist journals. Upon questioning, reveals that Karl Marx was a silent film star of the 1920s. Eats my bacon portion while I'm in the bathroom. Flirts openly with the waitress.
I gave the Paper Test to the boy I'm dating now — the one I'm super-compatible with, love to pieces and have been with for over half a year. Like you, I appreciated the fact that he was kind, considerate and attentive. Yet I had serious doubts about his, as you put it, zip level and "intellectual capacity."
He scored a 2.
Normally I would have taken my bacon and high-tailed it for the hills. But on the advice of my shrink, I gave it a few more dates. And I'm so glad I did. He wasn't dumb, he was quiet. He wasn't slack-jawed, he was neurotic and pensive. He was thinking all kinds of thoughts, he just needed to get comfortable enough to express them.
Now I know he's a sensitive, silly curmudgeon who loves chemical-laden diet foods but buys his produce organic. He's a book snob who specializes in dense Irish literature, but will watch any romantic comedy as long as Anne Hathaway's in it. Like me, he's a mix of high- and lowbrow, a lover of people and full of contradictions. The only difference is, unlike me, he doesn't let everyone know this within five minutes of meeting him.
Now that I've made you all sick and jinxed the fuck out of the best relationship I've had in a long while, I'll leave you with this:
It's good to have dating benchmarks for intellect, career, goals and all that practical stuff. But don't focus so much on them that you ignore important realities, like how you feel with this person and how they treat you. If you enjoy being with him and share sexual attraction, give him a little longer to bring the pizzazz. Ask him to take you to something he enjoys. Put him in a situation where he's the expert and you're a novice. Be completely subdued on a date or share something embarrassing about yourself. Maybe he feels intimidated by you, and this will bring him out of his boyshell.
If you do all this and you still feel like there's no one manning the Slurpee Station, you are free to go. Respect and intellect are too closely tied for you to compromise.
| Previous Miss Info |








Commentarium (22 Comments)
Regarding the paper test, I' curious: what's the the rating if a guy rolls it up and spanks you with it while sucking you silly doggy style while ordering a delivery of bacon and assorted breakfast items?
She said she liked the orgasms better, not that she liked sex with her toy better. This is a crucial difference. I'm one of those supposed lucky few who have multiple vaginal orgasms, but they don't make me feel "done." For that I need a clitoral orgasm. Unfortunately, lovers assume that since I've already had a bunch of vaginal orgasms I don't need anything more. So they are shocked and offended when I reach over for my toy while they are drifting off to sleep. They feel like I'm flipping them the bird, when really I just want to be able to drift off to sleep too instead of lying there feeling miserable and frustrated. Second point: it is perfectly possible (and fun and desirable) for a lover to give me orgasms that send me over the moon, completely eclipsing vibrator orgasms. But few bother to find out how.
If it were the first Sunday after adult sleepover, I would find it difficult to concentrate on reading the paper while new love is sitting across from me, regardless of how smart I happened to be.
A Sunday New York Times spanking would, I imagine, be clumsy and overly thuddy. And I'm a size queen. Maybe just the fron page and arts sections?
Would a spanking from the NYT magazine be more or less pleasurable than a section of the actual paper? Discuss.
Miss Info, thank you for the advice you gave regarding the "paper test." I am always torn between giving someone the benefit of the doubt and going with my gut. Unfortunately, I usually don't give my gut very long to make a decision, and end up making snap judgments about my compatibility with a guy after only 1 or 2 encounters. Sometimes things are obvious even by then, but I do worry that I might jump the gun at times and miss a diamond in the rough, like your sensitive curmudgeon. As a friend recently told me, sometimes the slow-burn effect is the most powerful. Thanks for reinforcing that fledging belief of mine.
Bitches! Both of them don't need to be in relationships!
Erin,
Even at my age (a little older than you), I appreciate your list. Like you, I unleash this stuff after moments, want the high/low brow-people loving-contradictory thingy in my guy. Be grateful that there are more around who are closer to your age.
Blessings,
Ruthie
Journalese prose--bleh! Oh wait, I read nerve so I can't be a stuffy pedant.
Great pair of letters and excellent responses. As to the paper test, we all err in making quick judgments about people. It is part of human nature and takes constant reminding to avoid. Sometimes we over-expect (i.e. think they are great when really they are average or less), but generally we under appreciate.
it doesn't take much intellectual effort on a dude's part to understand that it's the clitoris that produces the orgasm, not the Dick. so if he's not willing to make that simple effort, I call him an asshole. get over yourself and your stupid dick. What's important is that you are a good lover, not that she play along while you pretend you are "giving" her orgasms. if you want to fuck a girl who's faking it go do some porn.
Hello boys, I am Sandra and I want to write my little commentary. I am want to place your text at my personal blog, with link to your blog. Is it normal for your? give to me your answer, please.
nice, you wrote a excellent one.
You can make mirrow of your blog on blogspot. This platform more easy for users
lLJcae I subscribed to RSS, but for some reason, the messages are written in the form of some hieroglyph (How can it be corrected???
Yeah, now it's clear ... And firstly I did not understand very much where there was the link with the title itself .....
A unique note!!!
I would add something else, of course, but in fact almost everything is mentioned...
Strange but true. Your resource is expensive. At least it could be sold for good money on its auction...
Left on my site a link to this post. I think many people will be interested in it!!!
As usual, the webmaster posted correctly!!!
Of course, I understand a little about this post but will try cope with it...
Now you say something