|
Well, it had to do with one of them. He sat slumped in his chair at the desk beside the defense attorney, legs kicked out underneath the table. He looked exactly like I remembered him. "A good-looking kid, lean, muscular build, almond-shaped eyes." And when I described him like that to the judge, keeping eye contact with the kid as I did so, he winked at me. I don't know if that's what made me cry on the stand. It could have been a lot of things, because the ordeal was so intense. I tried to remain poised, unruffled — tourist mugged in the French Quarter, no big deal — but inside, I was beginning to hemmorhage. What upset me more than the wink was the way the defense attorney twisted my words, yanked them out of context, a year after I had spoken them. That wasn't the order you gave us at the time, that wasn't what you said it that night, don't you think you should have mentioned that before now? It felt unfair, and although I don't cry when I'm scared, I do cry when I'm frustrated. I lasted through forty-five minutes of that cross-examination, and at about the forty-six-minute mark, my breath turned to hiccups, a tear torpedoed onto the witness stand, the bored boys in jumpsuits suddenly took interest, and someone wearing a tie was dispatched to get me a Kleenex. It was awful, that hot purple ache in your throat that feels like a fist squeezing. I wanted to be unshakeable in front of that kid; I didn't want to give him the satisfaction of knowing how he'd wounded me. I didn't want to look weak, vulnerable, but what can I say? I guess he won. (By the way, he won the motion, too. But I promise things get better. I told you this wasn't a tragedy.) I left the witness stand as the detective took it. As I passed him in the corridor, I remember feeling an extra twinge of misery that
|
There's something romantic about talking to someone on the phone, even if it's the romance of 1983.
|
he saw me this way. That morning, as we drank a cup of bad coffee and made each other laugh just to lighten the mood, I had taken such pride in my composure — me, the one always crying in restaurants. But here I was again, red eyes and runny mascara. I went to the women's bathroom, locked myself in the stall and cried. It was the kind of crying that feels like vomiting. Or screaming. Or an orgasm, except that kind of ecstasy was the furthest thing from my mind. I didn't even sit on the toilet; I just stood there, face covered with slimy hands, bent over close to the plastic toilet-paper dispenser. I don't know how long I was in there. Twenty minutes? Five? When I finally emerged, I discovered a woman in the corner, silent and worried, waiting for the right time to ask if I was okay. The defense attorney was earning his paycheck that day. Outside the courtroom, I could hear a cross-examination as grueling as mine. There was yelling, and repeated objections, and I thought at first that Nick might actually be losing his temper on the stand, but that was before I learned that Nick is one of the calmest people I know. Oh, that's his name, by the way: Nick. I'm going to stop calling him "the detective" now, and this is pretty much the moment I made that switch in my real life, too. Nick looked beat when he came out of the courtroom. "Some cases are better than others," he said with a sigh. And then: "Come on. Let me take you to lunch." I don't know how to explain what happened next. Or maybe I don't want to. It's funny, because I feel like I'm always falling in love with strangers — the friendly guy at the bodega, the scruffy delivery boy with a messenger bag — but the idea of romance with Nick hadn't even occurred to me. Because he was a detective in New Orleans, and I was a writer in New York, and I knew exactly the parameters of what we were doing at that moment: we were just two people, joking away a bad morning. A week later, I sent him a gift. I wanted to thank him for lunch; I also, probably, wanted to make sure he didn't forget me. Two weeks after that, he sent me a card. I wrote him a letter. He sent me a book. We started talking on the phone — for hours at a stretch, like we were middle schoolers confined to our bedroom. Our second phone conversation lasted three hours. And we didn't hang up. His cellphone battery ran out.
|
Commentarium (21 Comments)
Sarah - You made me cry in a not bad kind of way. Here's to caring about and loving enough to cry about it. Happy 2008 to you.
Sarah, I've been a long time reader (originally of your blog, then of your writings on The Morning News, and at Nerve). I just wanted to say that I'm glad you've found what sounds to be a great guy. I hope it works out, and I trust that it will.
--David
I would have thought with the salon gig this would have been finally over? Oh well. It is sub headlined the end.
Yeah, Sarah Hepola. Your story made me cry. I am happy for your success. Heather Frankie
Is anyone else disturbed by the "weepy-white-woman-protected-by-John-Law-from-the-scary-Black-guy" narrative going on in this story? He got FIFTEEN YEARS for mugging her in post-Katrina New Orleans, but sometimes bad things like that can lead to good stuff like cuddling in bed and being consoled about your cat possibly dying at some point in the future.
I'm not trying to say that she doesn't deserve love and joy... but damn. I propose another column entitled "Crying in Restaurants about Uncritical Reflections on Race and Class."
thank you i cant say more right now but my heart feels i am unable to finish right now i just hope and pray
to tell you the truth am not sure how to ue the comp so well lol not sure how to get basck to finish your story but thank you for having me hope
I agree with you, RAZA. This column has always felt self indulgent to me, but this last one goes too far. He gets 15 years, she gets cuddles and sympathy?! and this is somehow supposed to prove that something great can come out of something terrible?! I'm just amazed at the level of self indulgence here.
Thank you for your story; it made me happy - but also melancholy - which I like. jd02
Ouch, these comments are cruel! Please tell me why somebody who mugged the writer deserves to be the subject of her dispassionate treatise on class and race? Under the circumstances, I think the writer has more right to feel this was a fair sentence as you do to think it's excessive. If someone mugged my wife, I'd want him locked up AND kicked in the balls as well, but that's just me.
Sarah, as someone who is 12 years into a sweet, loving, and happy marriage with someone I met and fell in love with online, may your days be filled with happiness and all the best kinds of tears. Thanks for sharing your story.
I double-checked, and the mugger is described as black in only one place in the article. Just delete the word in that one spot, and read it again, not caring about the race of the mugger, and see if you like it better. I'm personally grateful that a) Justice prevailed, at least eventually, and b) Sarah found someone to make her cry for different reasons. However, I still am left not knowing how you get on your return flight home if someone steals your ID in the middle of the trip.
great article, very intense. Nathan
Hi Sarah. I'm glad you met a nice guy. I hope it works out for you. But let's get real... You don't really know him very well. You are not yet truly in love. Relax, take it slowly, maybe you two are compatible and will live happily ever after. But you don't know that yet. Also, it seems quite unprofessional of your boyfriend to get involved with a participant in a current case. (Even if you did not directly discuss the case.) Isn't this a violation of his ethical guidelines?
A lovely addition.
A lovely ending, and yes, incredibly wonderful things come out of nowhere from the smallest of choices or coincidences, or even from what seem like bad things at the moment. Love came to me, also, from a person I didn't expect it from or intended to look for it with. As for the mugger -- who knows what his record was. But in some respects, he got off easy. If one of Sarah's party had a gun, he or she would have had the right to shoot this piece of crap dead (and I don't care what his race is -- aremed robbers are pieces of crap, period). If the case had gone to trial, their relationship arguably could have been a subject of cross examination, but it would not "disqualify" either of them from testifying.
P.S. I went back to the first article in the series. You didn't know how this was going to end when you started, did you? Makes it all the more fun.
I've read the last portion of this series many times, and it makes me smile. It's real, and I thoroughly enjoy it.
Respect to the author of original work. I am want to say thanks for funny post, and thanks to google and yahoo for perfect blog search.
Hmm, nice. im out right now.
Wow and wow!
Whay are you don't write about politic?
Why are you don't write about politic?