DISPATCHES



Seduction for Dummies by John Bowe

        


It's happened exactly once that I walked into a bar and picked up a total stranger. It was an entirely conscious move. Prior to leaving home, I said to myself, "I am going to bring someone home and fuck them." And then I did.

Other than that, I can't recall any other successful "pick ups." As a shy little undergrad, I wrote a few notes that began: "Hey, you don't know me, but" — none of which led anywhere beyond acute embarrassment. When I have, in fact, gone home with someone, it's been more of an accident than a plan. Or rather, it's a matter of two people acting upon a mutual charge, rather than me, sitting back, scoping out a soon-to-be victim, and bagging them unaware.

    
So when Nerve proposed that I shell out $350 of their money and order the Delux Speed Seduction Home Study Course, "Speed Seduction 2000: How to Create an Instantaneous Sexual Attraction in Any Woman You Meet," the idea appealed to my funnybone more than my boner. I found the idea curious, but also kind of appalling. After all, some people are obviously better than others at picking people up. But is there a quantifiable formula for creating human attraction?

    
The kit arrived, containing a video, ten cassettes, two books and a score of flashcards — everything one needs to discover the newest "technologies" for "How to Fake Like You Are Warm and Friendly"; and "How to Take That Bitch Who 'Just Wants to Be Friends' and Have Her Begging You to Bone Her ONE MORE TIME."

    
Ross Jeffries, a self-described "Skinny, Ugly, Six-Foot Geek from Culver City," is the man behind the Speed Seduction plan. (Tom Cruise's "respect the cock" character in Magnolia was loosely based upon Jeffries.) Jeffries' curriculum is complicated — partly because it's full of pseudo-scientific jargon, and partly because it's quite sophisticated, in its own way. Based on something called neuro-linguistic programming (i.e. hypnosis and mind-control, which is also the basis for Anthony Robbins' shtick), it goes more or less as follows:

1) Tell yourself that you're cool. Look in the mirror. Remember specific times in your life when you felt cool. Take a deep breath and hold that thought. Tell yourself the following: I make no excuses for my desires as a man. I move through the world without apology.



2) Go out and find someone you'd like to seduce. Tell her a joke. Break the ice.



3) Pose questions that generally begin with the phrase, "Have you ever," and get her to remember and describe to you experiences in which she's felt pleasure, or times she's been really turned on.



4) When she hits a high point in her description, touch her on the wrist. This will develop an automatic, Pavlovian response between your simple touch and her innermost self.



5) Keep repeating steps three and four, while telling stories of "friends" and "things you heard" about people who have had "unexpectedly intense feelings" and "close connections" to [repeat touch on the wrist] people they've just met.


    

The primary NLP aspect of all this is that, as you tell your stories, you're embedding commands. For example, you might say, "You know, some people find as they listen to someone who's very fascinating that they can feel very attracted to them." According to Jeffries, your subliminal prodding is inducing "trance levels" of awareness and suggestibility in her mind, until she's beyond the grip of morals, fears, worries about what her friends might think, everything that might distract her from having sex with a complete stranger.


    

The video included footage of one of Ross Jeffries' group seminars. The participants seemed to consist exclusively of members of a bio-engineered species of People Who Should Never Have Sex: chunky, Adams apple-y guys in shorts and dark socks, nodding dreamily as Jeffries blabs on about "patterns," "frames" and "submodality locations," all the while referring to women as "chicks," "snatch" and "bitches," alongside testimonials from men who've been transformed from virgin dweebs to dudes.





     

  

Commentarium (16 Comments)

Sep 05 01 - 1:24am
ml

that was fun.... cracked me up

Sep 10 01 - 4:18pm
PW

I can't imagine the type of guy who would buy the "Seduction for Dummies" guide, or the type of woman that would fall for that "prefab" shit. Is there a money-back guarantee with this program?.

Sep 10 01 - 6:10pm
WTR

Just what I've been looking for. Can I have yours since you don't want it any more?

Sep 13 01 - 5:35pm
NN

Some guy tried this on me last summer, long before I'd heard about it (I think I saw something on TV?). He was cute and personable, and certainly didn't need a "system." Funny thing is, I was less inclined to have a fling with him after he tried these things on me. I think he'd definitely memorized them, so his delivery was a bit better than yours, but really, it was just weird. I didn't quite realize it was an attempt at mind control, but it's just weird to have a stranger asking about intimate moments. Why would I want to tell him about them, much less let him touch me while I'm doing it? *sigh* Well, I'm triply thankful that I ended up not sleeping with him.

Oh, and in a side note, I think it's weak to defend the use of concepts like "snatch" as purely "motivational." But I'm sure that comes as no surprise.

Lastly, thanks for the article, it put a smile on my face.

Sep 14 01 - 11:58am
cdub

excellent point at the end of the article.

Sep 22 01 - 4:13pm
MH

Not a particularly well-done article. Too short, too cynical. If the point is to see whether the 'magic' works, then this author was incapable of entering into the test with the kind of willing suspension of disbelief one would expect of someone who actually spent $350 of their own money.

On the other hand, if this was meant as a spoof on such courses and approaches, we clearly needed a more comic character. The author really did not engage enough women or recount enough detail to give us a sense of 'fear and loathing on the pick-up trail.'

Cheers,

Michael

Sep 27 01 - 10:55am
WR

No really, I'm an avid follower of NLP and an amature hypnotist (it's an interesting hobby, fun at parties). I'm curious about this program from more of a "...if he could only use his powers for good..." sort of way.

Yes, that's right, I'm a guy that I can put people under trances for sex therapy reasons and make them experience almost anything I describe to them in the safety of their own clothes, but I can't get a date myself.

So, like I said. If you're not going to use it. Send it to me. I am the guy looking for the alternative to the "All Day Tsunami"

vulkan2@hotmail.com

Oct 01 01 - 7:19pm
LDS

I had first read about Ross Jeffries' NLP technique in Rolling Stone magazine about five years ago. I had to read the entire article because of his outright plaid tacky approach to "scoring." I was let down by the way he reduced what I've always believed to be a result of a chance meeting, one in a million compatibility, and warm intimacy into the cold, predictable, instantaniously drab one-nighter. But, sadly there are those out there who have given up on finding the right one, and for them there is Jeffries.
As a Bouncer for many years, I have seen how women and men throw themselves out into the sexually heated dance clubs and concert halls only to be left callously scarred deep within their souls because they just can't quite find who they are looking for. It's too bad nobody tought them about how a little faith, a lot of honesty and sincerety can go a long way into someones's heart to tell, no- show, to show them who you are and what your about. I do my best to enlighten the ones I see broken. Jeffries approach consumes the rest.

Oct 11 01 - 8:55pm
EAD

I think the last entry was dead on, as well as the comments at the end of the article. People- men and women both- are so afraid of getting turned down that they never even try to meet anyone new - and if you're going to meet someone wonderful, you have to be brave enough to just talk to them like a normal person. yeah it sucks to get turned down, but it happens to EVERYONE. It's part of normal human interaction, but I guess the point of the article was that the people buying this stuff just had trouble with human interaction period. anyway, well written and funny!

Oct 23 01 - 5:51am
GC

Hey, Guys & Gals:
It may seem impossible but Ross's Courses really do work. I have used them myself, and have known some pretty nerdy guys who had surpsising success. But learning the material does take a lot of work. An unusual number of women do respond to it positivly though. I would say between one out of three, and one out of five, once you have the stuff down.

Especially good for non-yuppie guys not rolling in the bucks (which too many women require). By the way, a secret gals. This works for women to get the guys they want too. You would be surprised.

Oct 26 01 - 8:30pm
JVV

For those who would criticize his technique- if one understood human behavior as it truly is rather than such a lofty conceptualization as most prefer to believe, acceptance of the authors ideas would be easy and make perfect sence.

Read: "Beyond Freedom & Dignity" by B.F. Skinner
There is a science of mind. We are not so "autonomous".

Oct 29 01 - 6:26am
DS

3 things: there is nothing wrong with shy guys trying to come out of their shell,
the beautiful women will only play hardball, and ross jeffries' confidence with women
tapes(mp3s) worked for me. BTW, I admit I'd never use the speed seduction
lines because of what you described happening with Pam.

Jan 05 02 - 6:57pm
N.A

This article is so stupid, just a cynical act. It contain absolutely no useful information. Nerve, you just wasted 350$ to make a joke.

Mar 14 02 - 11:53pm
SD

so your saying that Ross Jeffries speed seduction course didn't work for you? Did you give up on it...not master it???? Let me know ASAP, please. My order is coming soon and im determined to make this shit work.

May 24 02 - 3:21pm
Knob

First of all, you don't seem like one who should be pointing a finger at geeks and "nebbishes", you start your article calling yourself pretty much the same thing and then you belittle them with your hackneyed pity.
Then, if you had been a pro and done your research in a more comprehensive fashion you would have spent some time in the newsgroups devoted to speed seduction. You would have also gotten a better handle on Neuro Linguistic
Programming and found that what these people are teaching is what the Psychiatric community has employed for years to reach their clients (albeit not too quickly lest they eschew all those insurance dollars they believe they are entitled to), Tony Robbins is hated by them for exposing their techniques, or so my Psychologist ex-girlfriend once told me.
No, I am no student or practitioner of any type of speed seduction but I have researched it out of interest. One who really wants to learn it need only spend some time in the afforementioned news group to get everything he needs to know for free (advice and links to sites that tell all).
Mostly I wish you hadn't been pushing the deadline for your story (which seems fairly obvious), then I wouldn't have had to endure such a pithy, disjointed ending.

Now you say something

Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: