Not a member? Sign up now
| DISPATCHES |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is Sundance "over"?
Ansen, deeming the fest "borderline-dysfunctional." Even Robert Redford acknowledged that it might be getting too big. Luckily, Anne Thompson of the Hollywood Reporter and Eugene Hernandez of Indiewire were there for some perspective. Thompson was particularly astute when she called McCarthy out for not changing with the times: "He's been covering Sundance a certain way for a long time and doesn't want to adapt to the new reality. Which is: don't stay in Deer Valley, far away from all the screening rooms. Don't drive. If you do drive (which I do) and your favorite parking spots are blocked, find new ones and walk." It's the deep, dark — and no doubt unsurprising — secret of film criticism: The things that make a film critic cranky are the same things that make your Uncle Carl cranky when he trudges in for Christmas dinner complaining about the weather, the traffic, the parking, and those damn kids today with their rap music.
turned off by the smug histrionics of boilerplate addict flick Sherrybaby. Some other critics, on the other hand, found value in it (perhaps because it featured a look-at-me performance from an often-topless Maggie Gyllenhaal). Evidently, it's a thin line between the electrifying and the stultifying.
James Longley's documentary was one of a number of Iraq-related titles at the festival, and far and away the best — not only a breathtaking portrait of the social dissolution of that country, but also a haunting aesthetic experience. ("Visually clueless"? Whatever, dude.) Weeks after the festival, its imagery still lingers, perhaps because Longley captures a type of voyeurism unique to our experience of the Iraq War. The director fragments his perspective, often giving us the same situation from a multitude of angles, usually swiftly cut together. What emerges is a kind of pop-cubism — the camera eye is everywhere, its vision fractured by its own multiplicity. A perfect correlative to a particular early-twenty-first-century geopolitical phenomenon: Iraq is a country disintegrating in slow motion, with the world constantly watching, waiting, prying, speculating. Longley's film witnesses a nation dissolve through a thousand different eyes.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, Kirby Dick's This Film is Not Yet Rated, a blistering exposé of the MPAA's hypocritical ratings board, might be the most enjoyable doc to come out of Sundance this year. I have reservations about a few of its theses. Dick rarely acknowledges that the NC-17 rating is the kiss of death primarily because many media outlets won't allow advertising for such films. He also makes the typical, and correct, observation that the ratings board is far too lenient on violence than on sex, but then trots out the makers of Gunner Palace, a film with plenty of violence and no sex, to support his general broadside. But when a movie fillets its subject with this much sharpened glee, such complaints become mere quibbles.
Sundance is probably the world's most high-profile venue for documentaries, but the festival program says nothing about infomercials. Yet that's what many of these films are. The World According to Sesame Street could have easily been titled Ain't Sesame Street Grand? Similarly, American Blackout might as well have been called Wow, Congressman Cynthia McKinney is So Awesome! Hell, at least the makers of Awesome: I Fuckin' Shot That! and All =Aboard! Rosie's Family Cruise had the cojones to call their breathlessly promotional pieces by their rightful names. (I should also add that the former, at least, is a pretty entertaining little flick.)
This low-budget comedy, directed in North Carolina by Jody Hill, written by Ben Best and Danny McBride, and starring the three of them, is the kind of movie you want to tell your buds about — at least, those buds who have a sense of humor and a fondness for goofy theatrics. Maybe it's not for all tastes, but when I heard the description — a small-town Tae Kwon Do instructor goes on "a downward spiral, abusing his loyal students and making a fool of himself" — I was hooked. That pretty much describes the film, though its style reminded me more of Wes Anderson's Bottle Rocket rather than Sundance legend Napoleon Dynamite, to which it's often compared. Hill's film shares with Anderson's an ability to get into the mind of its delusional wannabe protagonists without ever disrespecting them. The Foot Fist Way is hilarious, but it's also rarely snide or demeaning, a rarity among comedies of any sort nowadays. Please, for the love of God, somebody buy this movie and put it in theaters. I want to see it again. The Proposition
On the other hand, John Hillcoat's Nick Cave-written Australian Western, which evokes the films of Sam Peckinpah and Sergio Leone with its blood-soaked, melancholy beauty, is so relentlessly severe that I'm not sure I'd want to revisit it, though I loved it. A bitter outlaw (Guy Pearce) is forced by a tough-as-nails lawman Old Joy
Which brings us to what is probably the best film I saw at the festival this year. More in the vein of Sundance flicks of yore, Kelly Reichardt's Old Joy is the kind of meditative, quiet, disarmingly slight film that might get lost in theaters (I can see the screaming headlines: "Woodsy Buddy Flick Trounced by Boy Wizard at Box Office") but is perfectly suited for a festival audience. It's also, pace McCarthy once again, mind-bendingly gorgeous. Reichardt's whisper-thin account of a trip into the Oregon woods by two old friends who haven't seen each other in a long time might not seem like much of a narrative. Very little actually happens between our protagonists; they initially spend much of their time getting lost. Indeed, that's part of the point. The almost supernatural beauty of the world they're trying to reach remains largely distant — seen through the windshield of the car, or looming in the distance, or on the other side of the highway. When they finally get there, the elegiac tone doesn't stop. If anything, it hits its stride: The characters' passage through this natural world reminds us of their unreachable, unattainable destination. Watch closely and you'll see the words "You can't go home again" were never more appropriate. Luckily, Old Joy's desperate, tender beauty enabled Sundance viewers to experience the magnificence of a truly great film, even if only for a fleeting moment.
©2006 Bilge Ebiri and Nerve.com
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABOUT THE AUTHOR: | |
![]() |
Bilge Ebiri lives in Brooklyn and reviews films for New York magazine, and has written for Time Out New York, Entertainment Weekly, and Popular Science, among others. He is also the writer and director of the ultra-low-budget indie feature comedy, "New Guy." In case you're wondering, his name is pronounced "Bill-guh," and no, his parents weren't into boating. |

















Commentarium (2 Comments)
On your interlude: As a filmmaker who has made a documentary which you might describe as a "commercial," I think you are also missing the point. When you delve into virgin territory, you have to tell the story of your subject. Therefore, it is of no concern to the filmmakers of the "Sesame Street" to explore those who revile the show, because no one has ever made their movie before. Unlike Iraq or Vietnam or Anti-Bush documentaries, of which there are many with vast angles, the first one in needs to seem authoritative.
Another question: Are two of the greatest docs ever "Don't Look Back" and "The Last Waltz" commericals? These two heavily influenced my own, because mine covers music also. While you see some warts, you don't see Levon Helm telling Scorsese how much he hates Robbie Robertson, even though at the time he did. But is it a compelling movie? Even after only watching it 100 times, I still get sucked in and have to watch to the end no matter where I catch it.
CB: You make a good point, in fact. I think concert films actually occupy a genre all their own. (I'm a big fan of THE LAST WALTZ, too.) It's a topic that deserves more exploration, for sure.
As for the other docs, it's not like I want them to interrogate and destroy their subjects -- heck, a number of Frederick Wiseman's films are *financed* by their subjects. But I do want them to feel less like infomercials -- in tone, style, and substance. There's a fine line between information and propaganda -- and I'm worried that a great number of the documentaries I've been seeing in recent years cross it.
This may be partly because we live in a world where people seem to believe that everything deserves its own documentary. If someone really feels like Sesame Street needs its very own movie (for like the 5 people in the world that don't know what it is) then call it what it is: A featurette for the inevitable DVD boxed set.
Now you say something