More, please.
--zb
12/05 |
Very well done. I write wedding announcements for the times-- I'm a clerk-- and this made my day.
btw I thought dropping 'I write wedding announcements for the Times' to girls at bars would get me some. Alas, no dice so far (maybe it's something else though).
--LA
12/01 |
I'll come back and play anytime, I like this game.
My gaff is exactly my point. And now afd has been wrongly traumatized over g's none existent 53% (of what?). Again, Nerve has screwed us again by not backing up our explorations of sexuality with rigorous scientific and mathematical analysis. I suggest Nerve spins off a "Nerve Squared" to handle just these situations. They have an "I did it for science" column, but do the really do the science?
--MEB
11/24 |
Ok, next time I will choose a more simple ratio for expressing my sexual preferences. But: 47 x 100% = 4700%. As far as the "other" 53%, I don't know, is 4753% better our goal? This question will haunt me for the rest of my life WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER 53 PERCENT!!!!
--afd
11/24 |
Actually MEB, it would be 4700% better. Thanks for playing.
--MN
11/21 |
Didn't you all do this once before, and got the same, sorta funny but not quite impressed reaction?
Btw "g", when "afd" wrote 47 times better, he means 470% better not 47%. While Nerve should be commended for broadening society's sexual horizons, math illiteracy remains (at least) American society's greatest danger. Sexual politics are well and good, but if we can't really follow our government because we don't know how to interpret economic and scientific data, we're also screwed, but in a bad way.
--MEB
11/21 |
contrived and sorta makes me feel constipated
--god
11/21 |
Not sure about the bias against the wedding section. I was in the wedding section and I drink, take drugs, fuck and listen to indie hip-hop. Besides, most of the folks in the wedding section are from places like florida, long island, westchester and new jersey. Just like you.
--MN
11/21 |
of course, if you're really going to parody the wedding announcements, you have to make the eyes and teeth super, super white. whiteout on newsprint white.
--np
11/20 |
And who the hell is MCF? We need a message board so we can see who this, and other's I've seen roaming feedback, freak is. I imagine...balding, glasses, sweaty and well oiled. Probably in the heels he's (i'm sure it's a he) so fond of.
--burp
11/20 |
errrr...cool and funny comes from not trying so hard. This is sort of like a bad David Letterman skit.
--burp
11/20 |
Where's that other 53 percent, afd? You're not trying hard enough and Oprah will expose you.
I think any new section is fine as long as CHW isn't writing for it.
--g
11/19 |
Truth be told, the sex I've had as a married person is 47 times better than the sex I ever had as a single person.
--afd
11/19 |
It's funny for about five seconds. Then it just seems lame, fake and desperate. Who gives a fuck about the Times weddings section? Those people are gross.
--cc
11/19 |
Yeah, this section is plagiarism from the Onion, but what a novel concept. I was a bar hopping, pub crawling hound, always on the lookout for a woman I could chat up in a bar. I hooked up with some sexually enthusiastic women, and I am not about to talk about them with the steady woman in my life. I was astounded at the number of vivacious, educated, attractive women (single or separated from hubby or some boyfriend) who were open to playful s&m (spanking, being restrained, nipple tweaking, hand jobs, deep throating oral sex, etc) and struting around in their favorite stilettos to really keep me up. None were into anal sex or threesomes, but a few had been with a woman for oral fun. What a sexual world!
--MCF
11/19 |
great idea. not so great execution.
--dkl
11/19 |
this is hysterical, and fyi for younger readers: the onion did not invent deadpan humor.
--sgj
11/19 |
if you're going to steal from the onion, at least have enough class to give them credit.
--gbh
11/19 |
send feedback on "The Beddings Section"
back to "The Beddings Section" |
