Not a member? Sign up now
True Stories: How I Learned What "Pretty-Ugly" Means
The French are onto something with that phrase.
by Tracy McMillan
When I was nineteen, I moved to San Francisco with my soon-to-be first husband. With not a lot of skills (unless you count smoking cigarettes a skill), I took a job as one of those girls who spray perfume on you at Macy’s. I worked mostly at Union Square, the center of the San Francisco retail universe and the point through which every tourist there eventually passes. For a girl from Minneapolis, it was beyond exciting. I felt like I was living the dream.
But I’m the ambitious type, so I wasn’t content to just choke some people in a cloud of Giorgio. In minutes I had worked my way up to the next level of success in the cosmetics world: the girl who puts makeup on you at Macy’s. Here’s what I learned doing the makeup of regular ladies passing through Union Square: everyone is beautiful.
I’m not kidding. I’d be standing there at the counter with some nice mom of two from Walnut Creek, California, or Charlotte, North Carolina, perched in my tall chair. She might be feeling a little weird that she was letting me — a girl who still littered her speech with the big “Oh, reelly” of the Minnesota home I’d only just left — wield sable brushes two inches in front of her face. Somewhere between the foundation and the mascara, I would invariably notice something special on her, like the most exquisitely curved brow. Or maybe a business lady who dashed up to the counter on her lunch hour would have super-gorgeous skin, or complex green eyes flecked with bright brown and ringed with navy blue. Stuff like that.
Often the things I saw weren’t the kind of thing you’d notice on a first date. I had to get right up in these women’s faces, and perhaps more important, I had to be objective about them. I wasn’t putting eyeliner on them thinking about taking an up-or-down vote on whether I wanted to sleep with them, marry them, and have their children, or even whether I ever wanted to see them again. I had to be open-minded to see what they had to offer, and I had to look closely.
I once had a boyfriend who was, how shall I say, interesting- looking. He was what the French would call, in women, "jolie laide," literally “pretty-ugly” — attractive but not conventionally good- looking. His chin was a bit weak, his nose was a bit strong, his eyes were a bit... asymmetrical. When we first started dating, there were times when I would look at his face and think, “Wait, what?”
At first I even thought about breaking it off. Not only was his style completely different from mine — much more conservative — but everything about him physically was not what I was used to. But I stuck with it, in part because he had — seriously — a sparkling personality. He really did. He was one of the funniest, most mild-mannered, most agreeable people I have ever met.
We stayed together for a good amount of time, and somewhere along the line my eye... adjusted. He had a ton of beauty; I just had to look at him differently to see it. It’s like tuning in a radio station on an old-school car radio, where if you dial infinitesimally to the right, you can catch the amazing radio station from two towns over that plays the best oldies or whatever. I could see this other thing in him — how bright his eyes were, the amazing color of his skin when he’d been out playing (too much, way too much) soccer, his physical coordination and grace. Ultimately, loving that not-so-perfect-looking man made me aware of a whole other level of beauty that, even though we’re no longer together, I can still access and appreciate.
Years later, I learned this same lesson the opposite way, from a truly gorgeous boyfriend I had named Brandon. He was beautiful, with thick dark curly hair, enormous blue eyes, and facial symmetry that made you want to find the nearest hotel room. Brandon looked like Snow White if she were a really, really hot guy. We stayed together three years, and during that time I discovered that (unfortunately) the effect of beauty is often like any other effect: eventually it wears off. Usually sooner. It’s not that Brandon ceased to be gorgeous — the hordes of other women sniffing around all the time were proof of that. It’s that his beauty ceased to change the way I felt about him. It didn’t make me willing to put up with his bullshit (and he had a ton of bullshit; after all, he was in his early twenties), and it certainly didn’t make him grow up any faster.
I guess what I’m saying is, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And the choice of what to behold is yours. Of course you have to have a baseline physical attraction to someone (which we’ll talk more about a little later), but given that, you’re going to want to choose wisely. Because no one, not even you, is going to be young and good-looking forever.







Commentarium (34 Comments)
"We stayed together three years."
"[His handsomeness] didn't make me willing to put up with his bullshit."
It's in the same paragraph!
That's right, good looking men, the women of America have HAD IT. You've got just three years - a mere 1,095 days - and then out the door you go. No, no. Don't try to say you've changed. They believed that the last 1,094 times.
Love that.
okay.
This should be in Cosmopolitan, its super lame.
The key point, in paragraphs 2-3, is that every woman can be made to look her best, if she cares about that. She just has to try to recognize and then tastefully accentuate her best features. A visit with an objective makeup-counter person helps.
This is total news to me. It's not like every magazine I've ever picked up has told me that, because I'm a woman, I should want to spend a good portion of my time assessing/accentuating/hiding different parts of myself. Of course any woman can look "her best" (assuming you mean every woman can meet the media-approved standard of conventional beauty to SOME degree). I'm sure it wasn't your intention, but your comment looks like something out of a brochure from a finishing school (or, sadly, a Cosmo article).
"...facial symmetry that made you want to find the nearest hotel room..."
Yeah, my girl friend is so symmetrical, we fuck like bunnies all day long.
So she stayed with the unconventional guy for a few months or so, in between bouts of wanting to give him the boot for his asymmetry, yet stayed for 3 years with a guy who had a lot of bullshit but was gorgeous... yeah... what-fucking-ever.
She uh...she married the unconventional guy
Just kidding...
what's a 'good amount of time'... ? Was she proud of herself that she could stomach him for that 'good amount of time'... how come she knows exactly how long she went out with the good looking guy? Probably because that 'good amount of time' was MUCH shorter than the 3 years she spent with the other guy... this article is banal and irritating.
This lady is the WORST.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tracy-mcmillan/why-youre-not-married_b_822...
Just wanted to post the same link. This woman is living in a parallel universe. And check out all the Nice Guys in the comment section. Has HuffPo always been this misogynist??
HuffPo is more sensationalist than anything, and often that results in misogynist articles like this one. They're part news, part tabloid, part liberal scare pieces, mostly crap.
"I know it seems unfair that you have to work around a man's fear and insecurity in order to get married -- but actually, it's perfect, since working around a man's fear and insecurity is big part of what you'll be doing as a wife. " ... what the fucking fuck.? Don't you dare demand better from the system. Cower within it. That article was a really awful joke, right?
Actually, the reason I am not married is because I'm gay. Cheers.
The whole article is incredibly insulting towards men. None of my ex-bfs or male friends are that insecure and entitled. Neither are my female friends, for that matter, because I make it a point to surround myself with and sleep with adults who behave like adults and not 13-year old boys. Jesus Christ.
And she tells women to have children first with some random guy because then, quality men will queue up to date them? Because everyone likes a mommy? Has she ever BEEN on an actual date??
With those crazy eyes and dumb-ass carrot-top hairdo, she shouldn't be calling anyone 'ugly-pretty'...
http://media.metronews.topscms.com//images/4d/13/30fa9ede4be09386b2c1433...
Woah. Crazy eyes indeed. 'splains a lot.
Whoa whoa. Call her out on her poor writing but leave the physical comments alone. You're doing to her what we all had issues with her doing to others in this article.
This article makes no sense- so we can find beauty in everyone but at the end of the day the attractive person with alot of "bullshit" gets the cake? I don't see the point, when I clicked to read this I thought it would be something empowering about the modern mentality of beauty. (And by the wayI work in a department store and the biggest idiots seem to be those who work in cosmetics- sorry Mrs.Mcmillan)
Wow. First of all, she's just stating the obvious in more words than necessary.
Secondly, I just lost a lot of respect for Nerve for publishing drivel from this awful, slut-shaming, misogynistic author: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tracy-mcmillan/why-youre-not-married_b_822...
Ahahahah, I think I like the comments a lot better than the actual article. I agree, I'll pick up a copy of Chatelaine next time I want to read this shit. Also... You only stayed with him three years? His bullshit must have been tremendous. I'm thinking the "good amount of time" she spent with Jolie Laide was probably between 3-8 months.
love this - finally a grownup who is a real writer.
In Brasil they have a word for skinny ugly, and you know it when you see it. Funny how in the US, with an overweight culture, thin is in, even if it's unattractive.
Sorry but if I wanted horrible, judgmental "advice" on conducting successful relationships from someone who's been married three times, I'd call my alcoholic aunt in Michigan. I certainly wouldn't pay money for the same shitty advice in book form. Also I have my bitchy, angry, and slutty moments and I'm married to a fucking fantastic man who allows me to be a flawed and imperfect human being, so her advice isn't even valid.
It seems that there are a lot of books on the market preying on women's insecurities and using deliberately controversial language to troll for publicity (Lori Gottlieb, I'm looking at you.) This woman is just riding the trend, but it makes me genuinely sad that there are women out there who think this bullshit will actually help them. Anyone can put on a dress and a fake smile, act like a doormat who never gets angry, and land some sucker, but it will probably result in divorce a few years later. I'm sure Tracy McMillan can tell you all about that too.
couldn't agree more!
Most of the comments above say it all. Is this really where Nerve is headed? I understand the need to make money, and hopefully the advertising revenue from this shitty article came through in spades, but this is kind of the antithesis of what I expect to read on this site.
This writer is LAME and her how to get a husband thinly disguised misogny should not be given airspace
T.:
You're a doll.
Revolting.
I've been reading this site for like 12 years now, and this is probably the worst article that's been published on it.
I agree with this article, in principle - beauty truly IS in the eye of the beholder, and IME folks who are jolie/laide are often the loveliest people on the inside.
Not sure what all the criticisms are about?
I just read the article over at HUffPo and I'm truly baffled as to why she's being branded a misogynist? That article is just telling the truth - albeit in an exaggerated, trying-to-be-funny way that obviously flies over most people's heads. As a 40 year old female divorcee, I agree with her 100%. Those of you who are bashing her, you're simply defensive. She's holding up a mirror, and you hate what you see.
When nerve stopped doing news I thought true stories would come more frequently or at least better. Guess I was wrong.