Sometime this winter, I answered a work-related email from a man I'll call Joe, whom I'd never met before. Joe responded in turn; he lived in New York, near me, and had some further questions. Suddenly, at the unpredictable pace with which attraction flares out of nowhere, our exchange became charged. Within an hour we went from professional niceties to quick-fire one-liners; we were teasing and playing and showing off our wittiest plumage. We were flirting. And I was Googling him, wondering: Who is this guy? Is he straight? Single? Hot? Hitting on me? Then came his invitation, "to take this to a bar where it belongs."

Before I could even work up a suitably piquant reply, I had another email in my inbox. It began, "Hello, I've added you to my Joe'sJournal group at Yahoo!" Joe'sJournal's "introductory message" to me read, "I hope you'll enjoy this. It's fun, if I do say so myself, and you can learn all about me before we meet!"

He wasn't kidding. Among the things I learned about Joe? He was planning a big party in the next couple of weeks, at which he'd be serving cucumber sandwiches made specially on spelt bread; that his seventy-year-old mother would be a guest, that she had just broken up with a boyfriend and had reactivated her eHarmony account, that she has a blog, that her blog is all about her dating life, and that her son's blog is all about her.

And with that, so many question marks surrounding my promising email exchange with Joe evaporated. Attraction? Squelched. Fun? Over. Mystery? Sucked dry. Curiosity? I know all I ever want to know, please do not write to me again, it's been real, good-bye and good luck.

It's simply not hot when, after an evening of come-hither stares and maybe some foot frottage, you receive an email inviting you to visit ComeHither.com.

There used to be few moments in the sexual universe better than those early, butterfly days of love . . . or lust . . . or like. Whether it was the did-I-imagine-it look over beers, the gaze held across a party, or suddenly saucy email banter, the pleasure leaping from belly down the legs was all about the lurching joy of early-stage discovery. The first acknowledgements of chemistry made way for the slow reveal, the hopefully languorous unfurling of personal intimacies: who are you, where are you from, what do you read, who do you do and how do you like to do it, where do you live, who do you love? These are the questions that determined how many ways I would be pulled toward a man or repelled by him as he began his transformation from stranger to fling, dud, or lead character in my romantic narrative.

Alas, no more. Gone are my days of lazily unwrapping new prospects like birthday presents, asking intrusive questions as seductively as possible over brunches and lengthy drinks.

Nope. These days, you can't swing a cat in this town without hitting a boy with a blog . . . or a chat group, or listserv, or food diary, family website, online poetry monograph, or collection of unpublished photos of meerkat babies accompanied by a lengthy bio that he is eager to share with you, the stranger he's just met.

One of the soul-squooshing truths of computer-age congress is the speed with which we can turn up information on people we're curious about. It's useful, I guess, if you're trying to screen for convicted stalkers or major Republican donors, but not so much if you're hoping to preserve even a bit of enthralling mystery about your latest catch.

It's simply not hot when, after an evening of come-hither stares and maybe some foot frottage, you receive an email inviting you to visit ComeHither.com, "a random collection of thoughts on life and love!" Random thoughts on life and love are the crap you put up with — happily, perhaps — once you've decided that Mr. Hither fascinates you so much that you'd like to temporarily bind your own life and love to his. Until then, they are just embarrassing journal entries guaranteed to tamp the flames of desire.

Trust me, it happens all the time. Joe's mommy-and-me tea party wasn't even unique enough to be intriguing; at about the same time, a friend received an email blast from a guy with whom she'd been on two dates, advertising his blog about his elderly mother's adventures on JDate. (Perhaps there's a another story to be done about single guys' online investment in their single mothers' online sex lives, but I hope never to be the one with enough experience to write it.)

FIND MORE
True Stories: Letter to Myself, Circa 1998
Ridiculous Tips for a Miserable Sex Life
Talking to Strangers: We ask deeply personal questions to people we just met

Commentarium (17 Comments)

Mar 12 10 - 1:40am
ec

Yeah, there is something incredibly self-absorbed about a lot of the blog culture, IMO.

Mar 12 10 - 2:01am
ea

hello, pot, you're talking about a bunch of kettles, and you're way too judgmental and bitchy. the saddest part is that you're one in a million of sad, judgmental, bitchy women who use the internet as a career or nearly full time hobby and then condemn others for their use in it.

Mar 12 10 - 3:34am
ccj

@ea - I think this is more about the 'too much information' aspect of blogs. Sharing your life online is fine, just consider how well you know the invitee. On a first date, would you recite poetry about your ex, or bust out your baby pictures? I hope not. And this certainly applies to women as well.

Mar 12 10 - 3:41am
PO

Yeesh, ea, bitter much? There's an "off" switch to this thing if you don't like it, you know...

Mar 12 10 - 5:24am
ct

I like this but there is one glaring question that comes to mind...if finding out too much info, too soon is a bad thing (I agree it is), why the hell are you googling these people?

Mar 12 10 - 5:49am
ap

ct: totally what i was gonna say. isn't googling someone kinda creepy and wrong? i mean, how little faith do you have in your character judgement to feel the need to ask the Big Electronic Oracle about everyone you plan to have a wee drink with?

Mar 12 10 - 9:48am
Dan

a) I want to point out that that Dan isn't me, and b) it easily could be.

Mar 12 10 - 10:28am
MS

Yeah, I can't help but feel like on some level, anyone who has ANY internet presence in which they detail their various comings and goings (i.e., twitter, blogs, facebook, etc.) is suffering from some mild to severe form of narcissism that is ultimately a wonderful red-flag to pay mind to. Though I realize I'm maybe on the further end of the spectrum when it comes to this kind of thinking.

True story: a couple of years ago I met a beautiful woman at a party. I got her number and went home drunkenly and stared at it while chain-smoking. In a moment of shameful impulsiveness, I "googled" her. Nothing. I actually had to wait a day or two, call her, meet her, get to know her, and develop feelings toward her. She's now my wife. True story. Those of us without internet "personalities" are out there, and we attract our own, God-willing.

Mar 13 10 - 12:38am
js

Funny and well written article, but the irony is - by choosing the career path of "writer," and by writing for online publications, you have insured that anyone who googles YOU will also be bombarded with TMI...I GUESS there's a distinction to be made between blog posts and personal essays? Maybe?

Mar 12 10 - 1:07pm
os

mystery is overrated

Mar 12 10 - 7:37pm
jk

I'm calling bullshit. This woman apparently has met half the male bloggers in cyberspace, this story sounds completely exaggerated,. At best, she is hanging out at the tooliest parties in Park Slope.

Mar 12 10 - 9:20pm
ig

I read this on Salon 6 months- 1 year ago. why does nerve keep recycling articles (and a lot from it's own website)??

Mar 13 10 - 6:20am
JLF

It's because Nerve used to be a great site with great writing, but now they cannot hold up the monster web-site they've created. Insightful sex writing is hard to come by and the machine can no longer identify it.

Mar 13 10 - 8:40am
CD

seriously, is there anyone in country of u, s and a who does not blog?! that is the lasting impression of this piece.

Mar 14 10 - 8:59am
EG

Hrm. I would have thought the sooner you know about momma's boy, the better! Would you really want to have sex with the guy and THEN discover he probably told her all about it the next day? I repeat what has been said here before: why google what you do not wish to know?

Mar 14 10 - 6:03pm
kg

I can't even finish this piece... because basically the same thing appeared on Nerve in 2002. And 2006. And today.

Too much info too soon kills attraction. The internet makes this easy. The end.

Mar 21 10 - 4:09am
py

wildly exaggerated. I have checked on many people for my sister, who can be quite vulnerable, and more often than not find very little. Also,the author tried to make it look like she was the recipient of TMI, but I'm sure she plays an active role. She could limit her searches to criminal records for the first couple of a dates.

Now you say something

Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: