Not a member? Sign up now
Ranked: David Cronenberg Films from Worst to Best
On the eve of A Dangerous Method, we reassess the director of The Fly, Videodrome, and A History of Violence.
by Stephen Deusner
It's fitting that David Cronenberg's new movie, A Dangerous Method, involves Sigmund Freud, Carl Jung, and some old-school S&M. The Canadian director has been plumbing our collective unconscious for nearly forty years, finding new ways to depict our deepest fears onscreen. His sixteen features (along with his early student films) contain some of the oddest and most original imagery ever committed to film, yet even at their most extreme, they're more than mere spectacle. As we get ready to lie down on the psychiatrist's couch and talk about our dreams, we're ranking Cronenberg's feature films from worst to best.
16. eXistenZ (1999)
For his first original script in sixteen years, Cronenberg wove a layered tale of revolutionaries invading a virtual-reality game. With the characters in the movie playing different characters in the game, how do we know who the game masters are and who the assassins are? Is anything we're watching even real outside the game? And why does a good cast mostly act so confused? Jennifer Jason Leigh gets it more than anybody else, although we're never sure exactly what "it" is. Those fleshy gaming consoles — based on neurons rather than microchips — are intriguing, but Cronenberg explored eXistenZ's ideas better in previous films.
15. Fast Company (1979)
Only in Cronenberg's filmography would a movie as normal as Fast Company be considered the weirdo outlier. It's a drag-racing movie, downplaying the grotesque in favor of the mechanical. Showing an eye for landscape and local color, Cronenberg captures the complex engines, goggled drivers, and the ragged glory of Canada's decrepit racetracks. Those crisp visuals, however, can't elevate the b-movie storyline or the stiff script. Fast Company is, ironically, way too slow.
14. Naked Lunch (1991)
This isn't a straight adaptation of William S. Burroughs' notorious novel, because how the hell would you even begin to do that? Instead, it's a loose chronicle of the book's creation. Cronenberg sets the action in Burroughs' strange world, with Peter Weller playing a supremely narcotized version of the author. The actor's extreme understatement may be the movie's best special effect, but the rest of the film is muted and strangely matter-of-fact, despite the insects with talking anuses and the gloopy amphibian-looking Mugwumps. Ultimately, Naked Lunch looks more like a late-period Terry Gilliam fluke than a Cronenberg film.
13. Spider (2002)
Working from Patrick McGrath's 1990 novel, Cronenberg shoots London's East End beautifully, as a landscape both modern and primitive. But even that ominous setting can't save the story, which somehow makes too much and not enough of the character's instability. Ralph Fiennes mumbles and twitches his way through this tale of a man traumatized by guilt. His performance, though well observed and certainly committed, is so stylized that it barely registers emotionally.
12. Scanners (1981)
Cronenberg's breakout film is justifiably famous for its exploding-head scene. Unfortunately, the film's ratio of scenes with exploding heads to scenes without exploding heads is low. Of course, you could say that about any film, but it's especially egregious given Scanners' muddled story. Cronenberg was notoriously stressed and over budget while filming, to the point where he was writing the script as he was filming it. Unfortunately, the strain shows. A strong lead might have held the story together, but Canadian character actor Stephen Lack doesn't have the gravity or charisma to make it work.
11. Dead Ringers (1988)
Dead Ringers might be Cronenberg's craziest experiment, with Jeremy Irons playing twin fertility doctors addicted to prescription pills and their own company. The actor manages to instill both of his characters with distinct traits and personalities, and the director shoots him ingeniously, so you always know which one you're looking at. But even as it plumbs the mutative effects of addiction and obsession, Dead Ringers can be a bit too clinical.
10. Rage/Rabid (1977)
As a vampire film, this is about as far from Twilight as you can possibly get. Marilyn Chambers, emerging from Behind the Green Door, stars as a woman who develops a vagina in her armpit from which extends a prong that drains her victims' blood. She says barely a word throughout the movie, yet her naturalistic physical performance conveys both a bloodlust and a confusion over what her body has become. That central contradiction makes the film surprisingly resonant and its final scene especially tragic. As Rabid mutates into a contagion narrative, Cronenberg unravels an allegory about VD that might have been more powerful had it not immediately followed the similar Shivers.
9. The Dead Zone (1983)
Cronenberg isn't often considered an actor's director, his facility with his leads reaches its peak in this Stephen King adaptation. Playing a man who wakes from a five-year coma to find himself cursed with second sight, Christopher Walken is so alert to his character's conflicts that his plight seems all the more heartbreaking. Watch his tentative scenes with Brooke Adams, as Walken struggles to gauge his emotions and simply try to enjoy a happy moment. King's story is hammy and inconsistent, with an ending that's abrupt and out of character, but the performance Cronenberg got out of Walken almost makes you forget it.








Commentarium (27 Comments)
One forgets how good Cronenberg is until some article helpfully lists them all. I would have switched Videodrome with The Fly, and kept everything else in its place. I don't think Videodrome is nearly as coherent as it thinks it is, but it's certainly a startling and visceral experience
Where do I even fucking start. Is this like the 5th director ranking of the month or what?
I thought "Dead Ringers" was pretty remarkable. I would have rated it higher
Absolutely. Dead Ringers is easily in his top 5. One of the best King adapts ever done.
agree, agree, I found it troubling to the nth degree/ a damn fine nightmare maker
Huh. 'eXistenZ' and 'Naked Lunch' would rate in my top five, and 'M. Butterfly' would rate much, much lower. 'The Fly' belongs somewhere in the middle, methinks. I'd also have included 'Stereo' and 'Crimes Of The Future' on the list. 'Fast Company' belongs at the bottom (though the commentary track on the Blu-Ray is well-worth listening to) and 'Dead Ringers' belongs at the top. Even if he did steal the ending wholesale from 'A Zed & Two Noughts.'
the top five is an honorable assessment, although i would move dead ringers and dangerous method into the top seven and push m.butterfly down to the bottom. it is certainly cronenberg's weakest film. the reviewer seems to be enamored with gooeyness quotient in these movies. i have seen dangerous method and it definitely deserves a place in the top tier of this list.
I was thinking of bitching about the order, but this is a tough job. "A History of Violence" is one of the great moviegoing experiences of my life. That said, do have to beat a drum or two for "Dead Ringers." Probably his masterpiece.
You're all out of your fucking minds
"Cronenberg locates so much significance in the parallels between sex and car crashes that the movie never comes across as mere spectacle. Each offers an escape from the physical body — in other words, different forms of death. "
Bwahahaha!
I wanted to overlook my numerous disagreements with this list, especially since I haven't even seen a couple of them, including the latest. But I was a little taken aback when I saw the tepid and, yes, glacial Crash listed so high. And then I was compelled to respond by this bit of dime-store philosophy.
I once took a movie class (I'm sorry, a "film class") where there was one stubbornly textual student who always laughed at the often strained search for subtext and meaning. The rest of the class, including me, typically laughed him off or ignored him. After all, why was he even there? What is the point of a class like that if not to navel gaze? But the description of Crash here is making me rethink that long-ago student's term paper, "Why I Liked Basic Instinct," which spent a good deal of its space discussing the sex, the nudity, and Sharon Stone's hotness.
eXistenZ is definitely in the top 5.
Man, I loves me some Cronenberg. It's been years since I last watched "Dead Ringers," and it still comes up in conversation monthly. (Usually by me interjecting something about fucking a mutant.)
M. Butterfly was kind of terrible. I wanted to like it, I really did, but even Jeremy Irons couldn't save that movie. The adaptation from the play was just not well done at all, the movie became a weird love story with nothing behind it.
Wow, I didn't realize I'd seen so much Cronenberg.
1. Dead Ringers
2. Crash
3. EXistenZ
4. Naked Lunch
5. A History of Violence
(Don't really care about the others)
A history of Violence was downright awful, therefore this list is invalid.
History Of Violence should be number one, but no way Dead Ringers isn't in the top 5. It seems like some of these choices--Crash, M. Butterfly--were made simply to be contrarian.
Move Naked Lunch into 4th spot, swap A History Of Violence and The Fly and then the list is pretty good.
I just love that people have such strong opinions about Cronenberg, people who may or may not have given him much thought before.
I also would place Videodrome first if only for its uniqueness and at the time insanely posited and yet thoughtful look into the future. But would place Eastern Promises next as his most fully realized work. Brilliant all the way through and in every way.....much more so than History of Violence which though it has many fine scenes is badly flat (and badly written) in almost all the domestic passages.
The Fly has no business being in the top 5, and Naked Lunch is easily among the best.
I'm not relating to the thin justification for placing Spider so low.
If the rating is based on comparing the movie to Cronenberg's other work, isn't that kind of missing the whole point of him doing diverse projects in the first place ?
Crash is my number one. I saw it on my honeymoon.
Thrilled that I'm not the only one with such a high opinion of Videodrome. I always imagined that McCluhan would have loved it.
All hail the new flesh - the medium IS the massage!
"eXistenZ" and "Naked Lunch" towards the bottom?! That's just crazy talk. "Eastern Promises" was more than a disappointment marking the end of one of the few consistently good streaks of any film director, it was a downright embarrassment, well worthy of cringe. And though it wasn't considered here, "A Dangerous Method" only continues, sadly, in that tepid, inconsequential vein. "Naked Lunch" and "eXistenZ", however...
"Videodrone"? yr kidding/ "The Fly" was also rated way too high/ & "Crash" not nearly high enough
I LOVED Videodrome, one of my all time faves and not just for Debbie Harry. Some movies are able to give you that creepy feeling, like the first time I saw The Exorcist, Rosemary's Baby, Jaws, Psycho - that uneasy creep that lasts long after the movie is over. Not like the boring slasher/horror movies that have to wake you up with a starting BOO! now and then, oh false alarm. It's a different sort of creepy feeling, another level of creep. Videodrome did that for me, after first thinking what the hell is this weirdo crap? Great movie.
1. Naked Lunch (1991)
2. ...............................
3. ...............................
.. . ..............................