not hiring

It's tough being an enormous jackass these days. You put up a sign reading, "New company policy: We are not hiring until Obama is gone," it goes viral, and suddenly everyone is on your case about how you're denying people jobs, contributing to the piss-poor economy, and, you know, generally being a jackass. Can't a freedom fighter catch a break?

Bill Looman, a small business owner from Georgia, has been getting flack for posting the signs on his company's trucks and his Facebook page in the last week. In fact, it's so much flack that he's disconnected his phones and temporarily shut down his website. Though, if you log on now, you'll be greeted with a message from one Mr. Mike Sankewitsch:

"All of you who have been less than kind in your assessment of Bill for his practice of that freedom [of expression], should be ashamed of yourselves. Every American has the right of freedom of speech, through the printed word or spoken, and for you to look down upon that right is to declare that not only do you not believe in the American Constitution, but to also declare to all that listen that you do not care to be branded an American. How sad that is."

Looman similarly insists that he was only voicing his opinion, and predicting that he wouldn't be able to hire anyone due to Obama's policies. He did not mean to indicate he "isn't hiring" to "make a political point." (Just to be clear, I'm using quotation marks here less the way people use them to convey direct quotes than the way John McCain uses them to talk about women's health.)

See, I guess my puny, Constitution-defying brain failed to grasp all this. Because, generally, when I read, "New company policy: We are not hiring until Obama is gone," I tend to take that as the person is refusing to hire employees until the current president, whom he disagrees with, is out of office. Which seems kind of like a political statement. And also like general jackassery.

Commentarium (21 Comments)

Nov 28 11 - 5:48pm
Just another moron

who thinks the 1st Amendment = immunity from criticism.

Nov 29 11 - 9:12am
Me

Just about everyone, it seems. The knee-jerk reaction to people telling you they don't like what you just said is to tell them they're somehow trying to silence you. Ironic.

Nov 28 11 - 5:56pm
Gazbo

The minute this guy can make a buck by hiring somebody, he will - no matter who's president. And no matter what the tax rate is, either.

Nov 28 11 - 6:04pm
JCB

I love these people who equate freedom of choice with a lack of consequences for one's choices. This man has the right to exercise his freedom of speech, and his fellow Americans also have the right to exercise their freedom of speech by letting him know he said something mean and dumb. Nobody's arresting him for what he said, so how are his rights being violated?

Nov 28 11 - 6:45pm
meh

Would you have sympathy for a business owner who agreed with Obama and had his business website, phones and facebook page overloaded with negative comments?

Most likely not. Probably get upset about anonymous comments posted on Nerve articles, well only those that don't agree with your view point.

Don't like his stance don't use his services.

Nov 28 11 - 7:30pm
Only a dumb ass

would draw the conclusion that this man's douchebag status is a result of agreeing or disagreeing with Obama. In fact, I'd bet the locals in Georgia are dumb enough to give this hick extra business as a result of his stupid "policy".

Nov 29 11 - 11:02am
Really

Putting the sign up is inviting comment. I wouldn't put political stickers on a business vehicle no matter what opinion it was stating - in the sage if somewhat paraphrased words of Michael Jordan, both political sides buy stuff. If this guy's business is struggling, it's probably got more to do with the kind of stupidity that causes him to go out of his way to offend potential customers than anything the government has done.

But the idea that "I" have a First Amendment right to say stuff and the rest of the world doesn't have a First Amendment right to respond really has got to go.

Nov 28 11 - 7:06pm
Huh?

Except that is *exactly* what he meant, regardless of your use of quotes to indicate the opposite: he clearly stated in every interview that his position is that he feels he will be unable to hire anyone new until the economy improves, something he feels is not able to happen under the current regime.

(Which I tend to agree with -- they haven't figured out how to create any significant new jobs so far, except for security and hospitality staff to cover Ms. Obama's extended vacation plans.)

Nov 28 11 - 7:12pm
Crooklyn

Charming. Love that everybody seems to have forgotten Bush practically lived at Crawford during his presidency. Obama takes his kids on vacation and suddenly he's fiddling while America burns.

Nov 28 11 - 7:34pm
@Crooklyn

"Huh?" is a fucking idiot:

George W. Bush's vacation time (grand total)
487 days at Camp David
490 days at Crawford Ranch
43 days at Kennebunkport Compound

Total: 1020 days, more than 1/3rd of his presidency. Bush set the record for most vacation time taken by president.

Carter took 79 days in 4 years.
Clinton took 152 days in 8 years.

Reagan took 335 days in 8 years.
Bush Sr. took 543 days in 4 years!

So far, President Obama has taken 61 vacation days after 31 months in office. At this point in their presidencies, George W. Bush had spent 180 days at his ranch. Ronald Reagan had taken 112 vacation days at his ranch.

Nov 28 11 - 8:52pm
Huh?

Hey douchebags, I was talking about Mrs. Obama and her insatiable need to waste millions of taxpayer dollars traveling separately from her husband. Perhaps you should learn to read before you reply.

And while I'm in no way a supporter of Dubya, in his defense the majority of his time @ the ranch, and much of the time @ Camp David, were so-called "working vacations." Not simply getting a morning briefing as all Presidents do while on vacation, but conducting all the duties he would normally have conducted @ the White House.

Nov 28 11 - 9:08pm
Douchebags

Maybe you should be less concerned about the costs of travel plans for the Obamas and more focused on the 13 trillion the fed gave away to the banks without public or congressional approval?

Nov 29 11 - 11:04am
Really

All Presidential vacations are working vacations. Believe me, Obama isn't clocking out for a couple of weeks and leaving Biden in charge.

Nov 29 11 - 2:27pm
Dubya

They aren't all woking vacations. Cheney was in charge most of the time while I was pretending to be a tough guy clearing brush in Crawford, TX.

Nov 30 11 - 3:14pm
Osama

Let us not forget that it was on one of Dubya's "Working Vacations" that he ignored the "Bin Laden Determined to Strike US" briefing.

Nov 29 11 - 4:24am
Endless

These conservatives who say something controversial and know it's controversial must read from the same moron handbook on how to become a victim after voicing your opinion. No one is trampling on your rights to say dumb things, we'll point them out though. Grow up and read a book! And don't hide behind your military credentials, you ain't special. Also, "Company Policy" translates to a decision you've made as a businessman, not the results of a govt's policy, you made that choice yourself no matter how much denial regret spin you apply.

Nov 29 11 - 6:46am
FLACK? WTF?

Ok great aunt Mildred. LOL!

Nov 29 11 - 9:18am
Me

I am offended and you should be ashamed of yourself! My Aunt Mildred is a strong, independent woman who would never flinch at mere criticism from others. You must mean Aunt Bertha.

Nov 29 11 - 9:43am
mp

um, I know it's been said/implied already, but criticism is also a very much protected freedom of speech.

Nov 29 11 - 11:03am
ssdfd

everyone: take a joke!