Students walking out on class is not unusual, like in the recent case of the Harvard students who skipped out on their economics class in protest of their anti-Occupy Wall Street professor. But professors abandoning their pupils isn't as common, which is what happened last week when part-time Sacramento State psychology professor George Parrott, who requires his students to bring snacks to class, walked out on his Psych 101 lab after the pair assigned to food duty that day forgot the goodies.

Expanding on the subtle bribery time-honored tradition of giving the teacher an apple voluntarily, Parrott has forced his students to bring snacks to class for, according to him, at least thirty-nine years of his teaching career. A handout on the first day of class makes his policy very clear: "Not having a snack = no Dr. Parrott or TAs. Now you are responsible for your own lab assignment."

Parrott said that the reasoning behind his snack policy is that it encourages students to work collectively and connect in a less formal atmosphere, while helping maintain glucose levels that affect mental acuity, while also dissuading hungry students from leaving class in search of food. And Parrott's handout features specific recommendations for kinds of snacks that should be provided. Under "Good Ideas," it suggests homemade or bakery items, as well as healthy vegetable or fruit platters. And under "Bad Ideas," such things as Nabisco products and pre-packaged foodstuffs are frowned upon.

The rationale behind the professor's policy certainly makes sense, though some may be inclined to think, "What's up with this Snack Nazi?" Parrott said he didn't feel bad about making college students without deep pockets bring food to class, because he doesn't require them to buy a textbook for the course, which runs around $200.

But students aren't happy with their teacher having hightailed it out of class that Thursday morning to go have breakfast with his TA, especially since they were due to have a review for an important upcoming midterm. Instead of just saying, "No biggie, just bring some extra crudite and dip next time and we'll overlook this little peccadillo," I guess he wanted to teach the class a "lesson." But, said student Francisco Chavez, "Our education isn't worth food, it's for us."

Parrott said:

"I can understand the immediate frustration. I'm sympathetic, but I'm absolutely comfortable with the conclusion. The ethos I'm trying to promote is incredibly important. It may not be appreciated, and that's even more unfortunate. It speaks to their lack of understanding of higher education."

University officials said they take the allegations seriously and will conduct an investigation.

Commentarium (11 Comments)

Nov 14 11 - 1:55am
....

lmfao at this story

Nov 14 11 - 5:36am
sara

OMG, I LOVE this story! I love everything from the wacky glucose obsessed professor skipping out on his midterm review (and supplying the anecdote of a lifetime for his students; the people they tell won't actually believe them) to the last line that you obviously were giddy to showcase. (I love that you ended on a dad joke! It's such a guilty pleasure.) It's a win win all around.

Nov 14 11 - 10:28am
Publius

Psych 101? At least it's not like it's anything important.

Nov 15 11 - 6:37pm
julia s

seriously.

Nov 14 11 - 11:34am
former prof

Idiot professor. Students are shelling out between 1,500 and 2,700 in tuition (this is a public school), and this is the reason he cancels class. It's stunts and abuses like this that lead to politicians calling for the dismantling of the tenure system. What happens if the members of the class decide that, for the rest of the semester, they will not bring Parrott his cracker? Does he cancel every class? While I fully believe in academic freedom, this is not what academic freedom is about.

Nov 14 11 - 3:57pm
Feudie

Maybe he should be teaching Home Economics or something where there's food as part of classwork.

Nov 14 11 - 10:42pm
il_maestro_teacher

This professor has been doing this for thirty years, yet it is now, 2011, when the "entitled" children of Gen X parents are complaining. This has nothing to do with the professor, it has everything to do with the sense of "entitlement" and "power" that the children of Gen X students have grown up with. I saw the kid who complained to the media: He's fat and arrogant. Read more about Gen X parents and fed-up teachers on my blog: http://teachersspeakoutforum.blogspot.com/

Nov 15 11 - 12:49am
Dee

What does being fat have to do with it, first of all.
Second of all, pimping for your own blog.. nice.

I don't think it's entitled to expect some education when you're shelling out for tuition. YOU ARE PAYING FOR HIM TO BE THERE; snacks or no snacks.

Nov 16 11 - 12:54am
il-maestro-teacher

I understand what you're saying, but, these two students who were supposed to bring snacks certainly enjoyed the snacks that other students brought. Why didn't they bring snacks? Has anyone asked. Also, the professor doesn't require the $200 book. It makes the snacks a non-issue. The real issue is the fact that those two students did not do what they were supposed to do. Blame the students for not following the syllabus.

Nov 20 11 - 10:35pm
Charleigh

If I communicated I could thank you eonguh for this, I'd be lying.