Not a member? Sign up now
Texas hospital refuses to hire fat people, cites elderly people's hatred of fatties
By Sean MorrowApril 5th, 2012, 1:00 pmComments (11)
A Texas hospital is under fire for a new policy which requires potential employees to have a body mass index of under thirty-five. The hospital, Citzens Medical Center, does not cite increased insurance costs, elevator weight limits, or small doors as their reason for the attempted reduction in average employee weight. No, no. The reason, according to David Brown, chief executive at the hospital, is that "the majority of our patients are over sixty-five, and they have expectations that cannot be ignored in terms of personal appearance." So apparently, old people don't like fat people, a stark warning of the prophesied Great Obese-Elderly War of 2213.
The policy isn't against the law, but only a handful of states disallow discrimination against the corpulent. In Texas, the only qualifiers that employers can't discriminate against are age, race, and gender. Which is hilarious, given that the elderly are themselves protected against discrimination, but apparently in this case, their hatred of the obese is the impetus for this new hiring decision.
One thing that muddies the waters is that Citizens Medical Center is already battling a previous discrimination issue, albeit a significantly less morally acceptable one. In 2007, the same David Brown sent a memo saying that he felt "a sense of disgust" that about the presence of "Middle-Eastern-born" physicians. "It will change the entire complexion of the hospital and create a level of fear among our employees," he wrote.
A background like that throws into sharp relief that while there may be pragmatic reasons to discriminate against the obese, remember that appearance is not one, unless you use the method places like Hooters use, and call your employees "models." Really, caring about the appearance of the people who are saving your life or caring for you is absurd. If it was an issue of physical ability or even something as basic as the hospital having to pay for larger scrubs, then discriminate away; you're a business and that's your prerogative. Discrimination based on appearance is only fair if you're trying to sell clothing or mediocre chicken wings.







Commentarium (11 Comments)
and how many nerve readers are obese?
Plenty, judging by the hu(g)e & cry every time someone makes a crack about fat women on NDC.
Seven.
thats FOOZY
Fat/Obese people, one of the few demographics it is still perfectly okay to openly hate.
As the daughter of parents who had children later in life (before it was a popular choice) and who now deals with many medical issues for/with them, I can say for sure that finding people with the right temperament to deal with the sick and /or elderly, is already hard enough without putting bullshit strictures like this one on hiring. Unbelievable.
BMI of under 35?!?!?!?!
Surely this doesn't affect many people, BMI of over 30 is already obese, so this is just cutting out the morbidly obese. Surely when a person has reached this size they are incapable of working or functioning
I think it can even be classified as a disability?!?
Actually, someone 5' 9" who weighs about 240 lbs. would have a BMI over 35. Obese? Sure. But absent any other health issues, they can still walk, run, swim, bike, ride roller coasters, etc. Someone of that size is still capable of "working or functioning" ... Have you really know so few people over 200 lbs. that you have such a skewed concept of human body size and abilities?
I guess that I would have a hard time taking seriously a doctor or nurse who is obese, especially their advice regarding exercise and nutrition.
Prophesied obese-elderly war got a laugh out of me...
Lardasses are just plain ugly. They generally smell more, whine about their lives more, spend more time in Loserville than the average person. But they are great to poke fun at. Give that lardy another twinkie roll and then watch him attempt to tie his shoe laces up. Doh he's wearing slip ons.