Not a member? Sign up now
Apparently, we're still debating whether vaginal orgasms exist
By EJ DicksonApril 11th, 2012, 10:30 pmComments (8)
Guess what, ladies? Exciting new research has been published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine proving once and for all that the spine-tingling, earth-shattering, fireworks-and-sparklers sensation you get during sex is, in fact, an orgasm and not just residual head rush from the pint of Ben and Jerry's you ate earlier. The series of essays, which was published online March 28, aims to settle the ongoing debate over whether or not the vaginal orgasm exists separate from the clitoral orgasm. Wasn't that nice of them, girls? Let's say thank you to the nice doctors for telling us things about our vaginas that most of us already knew. Like, really well. Mostly from experience, but also from many, many, many scientific studies and lady mag articles addressing that question.
Okay, in all fairness, although this is a topic that's been discussed to death by researchers and Cosmo editors alike, the essays actually do reveal some interesting findings about what actually happens to the female brain during orgasm. For instance, although researchers generally agree that different types of orgasm exist, there seems to be some dispute within the scientific community over whether or not vaginal and clitoral orgasms originate from the same place. (The argument is that because the walls of the vagina are linked to the internal parts of the clitoris, it's next to impossible to stimulate one without stimulating the other.)
However, research from Rutgers University based on fMRI scans of hyper-stimulated lady brains shows that different parts of the brain's sensory cortex are activated during different kinds of orgasms, suggesting that clitoral and vaginal stimulation are two distinct phenomena. As researcher Barry Komisaruk reports, the brain areas for clitoral, vaginal, and cervical stimulation are separate but in close proximity to each other, overlapping like "a cluster of grapes." This makes researchers think that all these orgasms are coming from totally different places in the body; it also makes me kind of never want to eat grapes again for the rest of my life.
The essays are chock-full of other interesting vagina-related tidbits, such as Rutgers professor emeritus Beverly Whipple's hypothesis that the G-spot functions as a pain-blocking mechanism during labor, and University of West Scotland psychologist Stuart Brown's findings that women who can orgasm without clitoral stimulation are less likely to use certain maladaptive psychological coping mechanisms than those who can't. (Gee, thanks, Brown. Kick us non-vaginal-orgasm-havers while we're down, why don't you?)
Not all of the study's authors are totally in sync with each other's findings, but they all agree on one thing: women should stop believing there are "right" and "wrong" kinds of orgasms, and should instead focus on their own bodies and what's pleasurable for them. So women of the world, whether you're a DJ Hero or a pink canoe paddler (yeah, as you can tell, I'm pretty much the classiest person alive), the medical community accepts you and your vagina just as you are. So stop wasting your time reading dumbass articles about whether your lady parts are normal and go do something productive, like masturbate for hours and hours and hours.








Commentarium (8 Comments)
I thought there was a study about this awhile ago with the brain...hmm.
Not to debate the existence of vaginal orgasms at all, but having something does not make you an expert on it.
I have a wang, but that doesn't mean I understand the internal workings better than someone who spends their career studying it.
That's true, but it does make you pretty sure that it exists.
But not really. No one is debating that women can have orgasms through vaginal penetration. The debate is where it's actually coming from, and what is triggering it.
Hehehe
Secretary...
I'm so glad at least one of the researchers is a woman. Whipple power!play
What's with the laughably condescending first paragraph? The author asserts that we should know about vaginal orgasms "really really well" and "mostly from experience", then goes on to say she does not have vaginal orgasms. Huh? No matter how many studies come out, the figures tend to come out the same - 70-85% of women supposedly don't have them. The real debate is about where orgasms that occur during intercourse (for that lucky few) actually originate. Scientists are in a better position to speculate on this than hosts of sex talks hows (most of whom are in fact women) who tell us to keep up the fruitless and infuriating search for our G-spots.
So how about the female orgasm originating from penile stim in the anus? I am not a woman, but many (not all) women who like butt sex can achieve orgasm without simultaneous clit stim. Don't get me wrong: I adore the ladies who strum on the old banjo while being sodomized. However, the ones who come their hearts out with both hands gripping the sheests are angels directly from heaven, especially the multiorgasmic ones, many of whom squirt. What they report: "The orgasm starts in a different place." I ask where, and they are not sure; my theory of this is that a person has to stop thinking analytically to have an orgasm in the first place. If the lady really trusts me, though, she can tell me all about the fantasy she was having when she came during anal sex. These orgasm-associated fantasies vary from woman to woman: from lots of fingers gently stroking all over the body to gang rapes on hoods of cars wtih foreigners who do not shave their genitals. I am not gay either, but gay friends have told me they can achieve orgasm through Greek (actually I know much less about my rectum than I know about women's rectums). That seems relevant somehow here. A final comment on LL's accurate report that 70-85% of women do not have vag orgasms without external clit stim: that percentage would decline a great deal if they had sex with men who are rooting for them every step of way and who, after a nice warm-up, provide a vigorous, glut-slapping performance with a thick, 7-8 inch penis. I am not an anatomist, but there is something up there that longs to boing to the boing; from my end it feels like bopping into a trampoline. Maybe this is what Wallace Stevens meant by the Palm at the End of the Mind. This deep trampoline-associated orgasm seems different from the orgasm where the penis pounds the clit from inside (the angle that you get with the guy standing behind the woman or lying on top of her when she is prone). And I can say that a Lesbian friend who takes great pride in her strap-on skills agrees with me about the Trampoline at the End of the Mind.