In a landmark case of conventional wisdom and/or common decency, Vogue magazine is going stop employing models under the age of sixteen, as well as models who appear to have an eating disorder.

The agreement will go into effect with their June issue and has been adopted by the editors of all nineteen international editions. Condé Nast International chairman Jonathan Newhouse released the following statement on Thursday:

Vogue editors around the world want their magazines to reflect their commitment to the health of the models who appear on the pages and the well-being of their readers.

Obviously, criticism of the fashion industry's somewhat unrealistic standards of beauty isn't anything new, but the fact that a heavyweight like Vogue is taking real steps to address those standards is a reassuring sign. 

The Council of Fashion Designers of America (which I imagine meets in some kind of underground, brushed-steel chamber, or possibly in a dormant volcano) has been working to promote a healthier body image in the fashion industry as of late, and has received the support of heavyweights like Anna Wintour and Italian Vogue editor Franca Sozzani.

The Council has also asked designers and modeling agencies to refrain from using models younger than sixteen in their shows, and for the most part, the request has been complied with. The exception to this is noted douchebag Marc Jacobs, who, aside from being known for only paying his models with his clothing, enjoys using underage models. He's publicly opposed this move by the Council (an offense punishable by sass!), and recently used underage models in a show. Because, er, fashion?

The entirety of the six-point pact:

1. We will not knowingly work with models under the age of 16 or who appear to have an eating disorder. We will work with models who, in our view, are healthy and help to promote a healthy body image.

2. We will ask agents not to knowingly send us underage girls and casting directors to check IDs when casting shoots, shows and campaigns.

3. We will help to structure mentoring programs where more mature models are able to give advice and guidance to younger girls, and we will help to raise industry-wide awareness through education, as has been integral to the Council of Fashion Designers of America Health Initiative.

4. We will encourage producers to create healthy backstage working conditions, including healthy food options and a respect for privacy. We will encourage casting agents not to keep models unreasonably late.

5. We encourage designers to consider the consequences of unrealistically small sample sizes of their clothing, which limits the range of women who can be photographed in their clothes, and encourages the use of extremely thin models.

6. We will be ambassadors for the message of healthy body image.

Golf clap for Vogue, everybody.

Commentarium (10 Comments)

May 04 12 - 12:35pm
Joe

Seems like a step in the right direction, from what little I know about the industry. Someone somewhere should be applauded.

May 04 12 - 7:43pm
Rj

Not so sure about the under 16 part. Many girls start their modeling careers younger and there's nothing wrong with that. In an industry where there is essentially an age limit (a quite low one depending on what you happen to look like, and skinnier girls show wrinkles quicker), it can be a financial necessity to start young and build your career.

May 05 12 - 1:23pm
...

That may be true of the industry, but the underlying reason that the fashion world needs to get away from using such young models is for the most part, they are not a realistic "model" to use to make/sell clothes for women.

Most women in their 20's, 30's and 40's (who I would imagine are the target market for designer fashion) are not the same size, dimension-wise, as a sixteen year old girl. Teenagers are not fully grown...why would designers use them at the base for the fit and look of their clothing? It's more likely that an average size person would need to diet to an unhealthy degree to fit into items made for a sixteen year old.

May 05 12 - 11:57pm
AlexT

That's okay, in addition to being too fat, short and old, most of us are also too poor. Sometimes a painting in a museum is beautiful but wouldn't look right in your living room. It's okay.

May 06 12 - 11:39am
...

Haha, oh okay, good. Now that I know AlexT says it okay, I feel so much better.

The problem with your analogy is that designers inspire fashion at large and influence all commercial and retail clothing vendors, even if it's just an item you get at Target. Clothing has a direct correlation to the body it's being worn by. The fashion industry is what's giving people the idea that they are too fat, short or old in the first place for any such item.

May 06 12 - 3:17pm
nope

There are people that are looking to buy these clothes, AlexT, even if you're not one of them. Fashion editorials in magazines are not museums, they are ads. And the women who are in the price bracket of these fashions are usually closer to 60 than 16. (Also, they don't buy the samples used for the models, '...', and if you're talking about couture, obviously a purchase that expensive will be tailored for you individually)

But the bigger issue, at least to me, is for the models themselves. In order to be competitive girls are drafted before they enter high school and their entire lives are warped by a notoriously short-lived, harsh, fickle career path. It's really in the same vein as those child pageants except viewed generally as glamorous instead of horrific.

May 05 12 - 1:29pm
...

While this may very well be a step in the right direction, the strategic wording of those points make me think twice. Most of the points say that the council will "encourage" and "ask" agencies and those who work for designers to follow these points and that they "knowingly" work with models who "appear" to have eating disorders or under 16. It's very easy to pass the blame to someone else, if you can just say, "Well, I didn't know." But hopefully, this will be the beginning of some fashion industry reform.

May 05 12 - 1:31pm
...

Oops, that they WILL NOT "knowingly" work with any such models.

May 09 12 - 10:26am
Peppermint

That's what I was thinking the entire time I was reading this. Basically what it seems they're saying is "we're going to try, but not really go out of out way to do anything concrete" Personally I don't think anything will change and this is probably just their way of getting people who complain about "unrealistic body image portrayals" and such off their back.

May 06 12 - 11:03pm
taylormade r11 drive

activities of scotty cameron putterthe dark matter that is the Imperial Security Bureau, Imperial Security TaylorMade R11S IronsBureau has two locations as a key control areas, aTaylorMade R11s Driver large number of Imperial TaylorMade R11 DriverSecurity Bureau elite forces to TaylorMade RocketBallz Driver work in these two regions,