"GQ" names Scarlett Johansson "Babe of the Year"

Scarlett Johansson GQ sexy

Is Scarlett Johansson's career over? Just yesterday, hours before GQ named her "Babe of the Year," it was announced that Carey Mulligan had crept up and outgunned ScarJo (sorry, won't use that term again) for the part of Daisy in the upcoming adaptation of The Great Gatsby. Quick: name the most recent Scarlett Johansson films.

Too late. Fail. She's still sexy as hell, but she lost me as a fan the day she married a total asswipe like Ryan Reynolds, who is probably most famous for refusing to get poor old Betty White a cup of coffee on the set of The Proposal. (Oh yeah, and she married a guy whose best movie is the freakin' Proposal -- perhaps he's been influencing her choice of scripts, too, the bastard.)

Seriously, though, I can think of plenty of babes out there who are equally hot, but none hotter. Although she may not have a "hot" career right now, just look at these photos and you'll know that it'll be a long time before she's off the A-list:

Scarlett Johansson GQ 1

Scarlett Johansson bra panties sexy

Commentarium (7 Comments)

Nov 17 10 - 6:10pm
FT

She looks great (in these heavily photoshopped pictures). I don't get the appeal. Great figure, but there's something odd about her features.

Nov 17 10 - 9:31pm
PS

"equally hot, but none hotter." - I beg to differ.
Have you come across the name Jennifer Connelly before? Perhaps from a generation recently passed, but still hits epitomes of sexiness and sophistication. She was far hotter for her time, according to another celebrity site, "a long, long time ago in 1994, Jennifer was, along with Pamela Anderson, the most searched woman on the Net."

Nov 17 10 - 11:15pm
Austin

Something "odd"? OMG, she doesn't have that homogenized like-every-other-babe look - horrors!
(would have to agree with the Jennifer Connelly comment, though)

Nov 17 10 - 11:50pm
sb

what happened to her breasts of former glory?

Nov 18 10 - 11:16am
FT

Austin, you're totally entitled to your opinion, but I don't think she's particularly attractive. IMO her features don't fit her face and she's more strange looking than anything. If anything, she's trying to be 'homogenized" - she's the one who's trying desperately to conform to Hollywood's standards of beauty. Go watch "Ghost World" or "Lost in Translation." She's very plain.

Nov 18 10 - 2:10pm
Twolane

Jennifer Connelly? You mean the girl with the eyebrows running across her forehead until she trimmed them? The girl with the nice rack until she had reduction surgery? THAT Jennifer Connelly?

Nov 18 10 - 10:18pm
Austin

Define "plain." Not enough makeup? Features not media-perfect enough? Not enough scalpel work? Doesn't get dolled up like Miss Universe when a role calls for something else?

Now you say something

Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: