Hugh Hefner decries GOP "war against sex"

It's not going out on much of a limb to say the GOP is the more repressed of the U.S.'s major political parties, thanks largely to its evangelical wing. Pimp daddy Hugh Hefner has spent the bulk of his adult life pointing this out during his downtime between orgies. And though reviewing an endless stream of potential blonde girlfriends can be time-consuming, Hefner did find a few minutes in his schedule to pen a full-page editorial in the May issue of Playboy titled "The War Against Sex."

Presumably written in a red smoking jacket while sipping top-shelf scotch, the op-ed has Hefner reacting to "repressed conservatives" trying to invade our bedrooms. He writes:

"For months I have watched the rhetoric building. Last October, in an interview with an evangelical blogger, Rick Santorum promised to defund birth control on the grounds that contraception is a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be... Ron Paul was no better, believing that the birth control pill did not cause immorality but that immorality creates the problem of wanting to use the pill. Mitt Romney vowed to see a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and to overturn Roe v. Wade."

When it comes to politics, Hefner knows of what he speaks, having once served as a top advisor to Andrew Jackson. No stranger to inveighing against our Puritan legacy, he tells us, "All these years later I hear echoes of this same ignorance espoused by a new crop of self-appointed arbiters who are determined to oversee our morality." He alludes to Santorum sugar daddy and aspirin-contraceptive proponent Foster Friess, as well as Rush Limbaugh's sexist potty-mouth, concluding, "Fifty years of sexual freedom vanished in a sound bite."

Hef shows us he still has that old fire in the belly when it comes to defending the right to hole up in a mansion and watch old movies while boning to your heart's content, married or not. He warns:

"If these zealots have their way, our hard-won sexual liberations — women's rights, reproductive rights and rights to privacy — lie in peril. We won't let that happen...Welcome to the new sexual revolution."

Commentarium (14 Comments)

Apr 23 12 - 10:36pm
jen

What a load of crap this article is. There is no such thing as a "right" to have anything subsidized. Pay for your own birth control and your own abortions and keep your hands out of my wallet.

Apr 24 12 - 12:33am
RD

Typical sentiment of right-wing thieves like you, trying to steal healthcare compensation from people who've already earned it as part of their jobs.

Apr 24 12 - 2:04am
Leech

Typical sentiment of left wing mooches - saying they've earned things that they haven't and are thus being stolen from. Sad.

Apr 25 12 - 5:47pm
jen

Yes, not wanting to pay for other people's stuff makes me a right-wing thief. What an ignorant fool you are.

Apr 23 12 - 10:45pm
Greg

This guy is just sad and irrelevant.

Apr 23 12 - 11:13pm
kennay

kenay

Apr 24 12 - 12:49pm
OctopusArmy

I don't think anyone wants you to fund abortions. I also don't really give a shit about paying for birth control. I think the point is that these funding issues represent a much larger "sex is bad" attitude that seems regressive. Abortion= bad? Fine, we'll never solve that one, because the two sides will never believe one another as to when life begins. But birth control = bad? Really? You tellin' me that a real good Christian never ever uses birth control, they just save it for marriage and then have children? I'd love for Rick, Mitt et al to look me in the face and tell me that's how they've lived their lives.

Apr 24 12 - 1:03pm
lucy

NObody cares who takes birth control. It's not being banned. IT's about making a religious institution Pay for it. There's no right to work in a certain place. BTW, Nancy Pelosi wants to ammend the first ammendment. Pay attention don't allow the distractions by hasbeens like Hugh Hefner.

Apr 24 12 - 2:09pm
..

Yeah, I'd frame it another way. You're free to practice and articulate whatever faith you like in the U.S. -- but as an institution, you don't have some special right to do whatever you like as an employer. You have to abide by the same laws as everyone else. You don't like what the U.S. expects of a modern institution, you can take it elsewhere. We all have to do shit we don't believe in. Freedom of religion doesn't mean religious institutions get a blanket pass.

Apr 24 12 - 2:17pm
LT

What ".." said. Spot on.

Apr 25 12 - 5:44pm
jen

Trying to create laws that force any business to pay for plans that provide free abortions and/or contraception are complete BS.

Apr 24 12 - 3:25pm
Chupacabra

His side in the "war against sex" is evidently lots and lots of abortions, free birth control pills, and homosexual marriages. I would've thought that an actual "war against sex" would be some sort of law banning people from having sex or people having sex getting shot by soldiers. You know...

Apr 24 12 - 5:29pm
Greg

And anyway this shriveled old prune has been firing blanks since Reagan was President so what's he worried about?

Apr 26 12 - 2:49am
AlexT

It must be sad for people like Jen to constantly be so fucking gullible. Reproductive issues are medical issues just like any other. If I'm paying insurance premiums or receiving them as part of my benefits package, then if that employer doesn't have a problem buying me cholesterol medication so I can keep eating hamburgers, then they shouldn't have a problem buying my birth control so I can fuck. It's part of my compensation as an employee, and as my employer they have a duty not to discriminate against my gender by line-item vetoing my healthcare so I receive less treatment compensation than my male counterparts. Maybe Jen has no problem going back to being barefoot and pregnant, but don't speak for the rest of us with tits AND brains.