Not a member? Sign up now
Pastor who banned Facebook admits to having threesomes with dudes
By Brian FairbanksNovember 22nd, 2010, 1:24 pmComments (5)
Remember the Reverend who banned his parishioners from using Facebook because it somehow forces people to cheat? Whoever predicted he would end up being a cheater himself, already tainted by multiple sex scandals, step up to claim your prize.
Reverend Cedric Miller of Living Word Christian Fellowship Church in Neptune Township, New Jersey once admitted in court that he and his wife had brought another man into their bedroom. (The man was a church assistant and the trial was a criminal one, but that's all anyone knows about the case at this point.) Best of all, the man sometimes brought his wife along to make it a foursome and they had these dalliances right after Bible study class. Also, other female churchgoers claim he slept with them, although it's not clear whether his wife approved of these alleged dalliances.
Make of that what you will. I'm sure there will be a statement from the Reverend any moment now that says something to the effect of: "I've struggled with infidelity myself, so that's why we all have to stop using Facebook."
Commentarium (5 Comments)
Technically a threesome with your wife and another dude isn't cheating. I mean, she's right there!
@JM: I agree that it's not cheating (assuming the wife's consent was not coerced somehow), but it's still adultery in the eyes of the Bible this person professes to follow. So even though I don't think anything consenting adults do sexually is wrong, he's still a hypocrite based on his public professions/private actions.
Does anyone else see the Facebook window that was left open on the computer to his right?
I am shocked that a man of the cloth could be such a liar. Or profess to fondling another man's balls. Or whatever he said. Can we hear from the wife/wives? Do we have pix? It's a total deal-breaker without pix.
Back in the day when I went to church regularly I sometimes encountered people like this, who would warn against the dangers of something that seemed innocuous. I always had some kinda strange feeling about their warnings but heeded them anyways. Now I know that they weren't actually trying to prevent me from making a mistake, they were talking to themselves through me. They were involving me, an innocent bystander who probably didn't have their predilections, in a conversation with themselves. Their warnings were almost 100% useless to me, they were only aimed at themselves. And they didn't listen to themselves either so the whole experience was a waste of time!