Not a member? Sign up now
Norway attacker Anders Behring Breivik's 1,518-page manifesto released
By Ray RahmanJuly 24th, 2011, 2:30 pmComments (40)
Surprise: Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian terrorist who bombed Oslo and gunned down youth campers in a neighboring town, has issues. The killer has a lot of issues, in fact, about a lot of things, but he seems to be primarily preoccupied by the presence of Islam in Europe.
Want to know more about his preoccupations? You're in luck; "2083: A European Declaration of Independence," his 1,518-page manifesto, has hit the web. In it, the charlatan provides a five-point summary of what readers can expect:
1. The rise of cultural Marxism/multiculturalism in Western Europe
2. Why the Islamic colonization and Islamisation of Western Europe began
3. The current state of the Western European Resistance Movements (anti-Marxist/anti-Jihad movements)
4. Solutions for Western Europe and how we, the resistance, should move forward in the coming decades
5. + Covering all, highly relevant topics including solutions and strategies for all of the 8 different political fronts
Awesome! He continues:
The compendium/book presents advanced ideological, practical, tactical organisational and rhetorical solutions and strategies for all patriotic-minded individuals/movements. The book will be of great interest to you whether you are a moderate or a more dedicated cultural conservative/nationalist.
Included are also demographical studies, historical statistics, forecasts and insights on various subjects related to the ongoing and future struggle of Europe. It covers most topics related to historical events and aspects of past and current Islamic Imperialism, which is now removed or falsified by our academia by instruction of Western Europe’s cultural relativist elites (cultural relativism = cultural Marxism). It offers thorough analysis of Islam, which is unknown to a majority of Europeans. It documents how the political doctrines known as multiculturalism/cultural Marxism/cultural relativism was created and implemented. Multiculturalists/cultural Marxists usually operate under the disguise of humanism. A majority are anti-nationalists and want to deconstruct European identity, traditions, culture and even nation states.
And so forth! Read the rest here, if you've got a strong stomach and lots and lots of time.
Commentarium (40 Comments)
And slaughtering Norwegian children furthers this agenda how? He's not merely a monster, but an idiot monster.
At the risk of getting a "too soon" backlash: Does he have a David Duchovny thing going?
Totally. Too bad he's insane and evil, he's pretty attractive. :(
~hippie
Destroy, kill all hippies
Try this: The love child of David Duchovny and Aaron Eckhart.
This guy just killed how many children at a summer camp a few days ago, and of all the things to discuss regarding that event as well as the 'manifesto' mentioned above, you guys prefer to comment on whether or not he looks like David Duvochny, or is attractive in general? What has happened to discourse in America? Can you imagine people a few days after Charles Whitman's shooting spree occurred discussing whether or not he was good looking? I can't help but feel like these comments above reveal how little the gravity of events actually registers when relayed through contemporary media channels.
Um, context.
I guess Seriously? wasn't around for Ted Bundy. You couldn't have a conversation about him without someone chipping in with a comment as to how attractive he is.
Also, this guy is not even a tenth as attractive as Aaron Eckhart.
By empowering more whiny white guys who can't get laid to live out their gaming fantasies in one big burst and having society go along out of fear of what they will do.
Also, yes, Duchovny with a side of Julian Assange. and , like, a ninehead.
Nice rant with a little racism thrown in for good measure.
You're welcome.
Plus, I am literally praying for Scott Adams to have something to say about this.
He's a typical right-wing neo-con religitard, in my experience. I'm surprised we don't see more of this happening in the bible belt.
You just keep being surprised. Perhaps your bigotry will eventually fail and you'll understand.
Understand religion? No, sir. I've been there, and I'm here to tell you that there's no understanding something that is completely fictional.
But all that being said, if you want to call someone that refuses to condone the slaughter of innocent people a "bigot", then you can hide under under your little pseudonym and go right ahead and do that! Maybe you'll be on the next hit list when some religitard decides that preaching isn't causing enough conversion.
The worst aspect of this: people are dead. The 2nd worst aspect of this: the gun lobby is using this as justification for why more people should have guns, so they can return fire.
Kind of hard to argue that if even 10% of the people were armed, his reign of terror would have quickly ended, isn't it?
I'm no expert, but I do recall reading of studies done (and some actually enacted out in double-blinds in classrooms) illustrating that most armed people, without comprehensive gun and response training, are as useless as unarmed people in the circumstances of a deadly confrontation. I think that there's a lot of belief that we could all go "Dirty Harry" on his ass, when studies and exercises have shown this to sadly be untrue. Perhaps someone less lazy than I could cite those studies and exercises here. (I recall seeing some that were in a classroom and were recorded, clandestinely.)
I'm not an advocate of gun control, nor am I an NRA supporter. I'm just not sure.
Yeah, the problem was not enough guns. Most shootings are caused by a gross surfeit of guns...
@@GutShot
I've seen that "video" you speak of, and it's one of the most borderline retarded examples of conceal carry effectiveness I've ever seen. A man enters a crowded classroom, knowing exactly who is carrying a weapon? The man is a highly trained policeman? The Conceal Carry holder is wearing a baggy shirt and a terrible holster? Give me a fucking break. That entire video looked like something the Brady Campaign probably funded.
While I don't agree that this should be pushed by the "gun lobby" as a reason to arm people, you're only blinding yourself by pretending like 80+ people would have been slaughtered by one man if any of them were armed. Giving people the OPTION of carrying has never had any negative correlation - in fact, crime rates in general are at a huge low in America despite incredibly less restrictive carry laws.
Norway has some of the strictest gun control in the world, but it obviously failed miserably. You can't legislate away crazy as much as you wish you could. You can continue to live in your dream world where someone else having a weapon in this situation wouldn't have helped, but you and I both know that's just not true.
Yes, when I think of a "safe" place to live, I always think of the United States.
No thanks, I'll take Canada or Norway or Britain with there "gun laws" and far safer streets than the good ol' US of A any old day. ONE incident in Norway versus HOW MANY in USA? Come on, you honestly cannot tell me that you live under that kind of self-delusion.
All children in youth camps should have guns to defend themselves
But all sarcasm aside, this is kind of pointless to argue about because the issue isn't because people weren't armed when Breivik opened fire. The issue is that Breivik is fucked up and began shooting in the first place. It's one incident in a country that has never had a serial killer before. So, how could they have known what "should have" been done to prevent it.
Watch videos of the shit that goes down in USA, and prepare? Just sayin'.
Well, okay? I mean, I know full well of the "shit that goes down in the US" (even though it has been rather drastically decreasing since the early 90's) but the US has more serious crime related issues than how many people want to carry loaded guns around to everything to stop all the crimes they see.
Point taken.
It's rather clear to anyone NOT in the NRA that it's you in a dream world. Probably not worth debating facts with you, as you seem intent on fouling your points with emotion and opinion.
When have 80+ people been gunned down in the US like sheep at slaughter? A well armed society is a polite society. Where premissive gun laws exist in the US, crime is low.
Dude, Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols killed 168 people. Give your fucking head a shake.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_terrorism_in_the_United_States
To top the whole sickening thing off, even if he's convicted of the absolute maximum punishment in Norway (which has no death penalty and no life imprisonment), the most he can get is a little over twenty years. He could very well be a free man by the time he's in his early 50's.
It's possible that he'll never be free - of his hatred. In this situation, I'm an advocate of the death penalty. Simply to remove him from society and the gene pool.
While it's true that the maximum sentence available is twenty-two years, there is a clause that allows for release to be conditional, even after that sentence is served. This will likely be the case with Breivik. He'll be sentenced for twenty-two years and, hopefully, when his release comes up for review, it will be decided that he's not ready to re-enter society. It's a sad day here in Norway - a country that has never had a serial killer and whose last experience of this magnitude was during the Nazi occupation.
I'm obviously devastated by this horrific mass murder of innocent children, but when I read parts of his manifesto - it seems nearly coherent and well researched. I can't read anymore because it sickens me, but has anyone else suffered through it and reached a different conclusion?
It's no surprise than many psychopaths are extremely intelligent, well thought out people. It's just that they're on the wrong path. $0.02
Take the (other) LiquidCourage, f'rinstance.
I am not convinced that this 22 yr thing is true, although I have seen it all over the interwebs.
Though if it is, I cannot imagine that someone will not go Jack Ruby on his ass. Seems to me like there are lot of people very deeply enraged by this, only takes one. Plus what's the worst that can happen to THAT person? Right, 22 years.
The maximum prison sentence anyone can get in Norway is 21 years.
Also as the Norwegian media have already pointed out he did not write the manifesto himself, large parts of it is just copied from Ted Kaczynski (aka The Unabomber)'s manifesto, Breivik just replaced the words leftist(s) with marxists and multi-culturalists.
I was wrong about the lenght (21 years, rather than 22) but I can confirm (after a lengthy conversation with my boyfriend's brother and sister-in-law - he's a lawyer, she's a judge and they both live and work in Oslo) that if convicted, with certain qualifications (read: convicted of the crime and assessed as likely to commit such a crime again in the future) Breivik would likely be given a sentence that would technically be set at 21 years, but would in actuality leave him in custody for the rest of his life - he would never actually be released back into society under his own supervision. Norway hasn't really had to face a crime of this magnitude before, but their judicial system does have safe-guards that mean that persons who commit terrible crimes can be kept out of society until the end of their lives. It's not a life-sentence in the same sense as it is in America, but it equates to pretty much the same thing.
Just pop the sick fuck right between the eyes with a juiced cattle prod and save the tax dollars. Same cure as should be used on every pedophile.
Was the manifesto in English originally, or did someone (or perhaps several someones) stay up all night translating it from Norwegian?
He wrote it in English under the name "Andrew Berwick" so that he could send it to people around the world that share his nationalist ideology.
"wrote" as in copied most of it from Ted Kaczynski (aka The Unabomber).
Koi to yaar hindu ke liye sochata ta hai ,aaj tak hindu ki sab ne bent bajae hai or kuch hindu ..hindu ki bant baja rahe hai ..sab log apne dharam ko mante hai or vishvas karte hai apne dharm per but hindhu keya kar raha hai