PERSONAL ESSAYS

The Obamas vs. the Clintons: whose relationship is more progressive? By Ada Calhoun for Nerve.com.

joni
  Send to a Friend
  Printer Friendly Format
  Leave Feedback
  Read Feedback
  Nerve RSS

I must preface this by saying that I would be delighted if either Hillary or Obama were elected. They both seem unlikely to slaughter civilians, endorse torture or torpedo the economy, so why quibble? And yet, there's one difference I find telling: their dramatically different marriages.

My mother came over the other morning and said, "Well, I'm off Hillary." This was shocking. From the first, she's been a die-hard Hillary supporter. Loved Bill, loved Hillary. Even as my father became an Obama fan, my mother stuck by the Clintons.  

promotion

What changed her mind? Bill. "Why doesn't she send him to Iceland?" my mother asked of Hillary, furious over the Jesse Jackson remark, among others. "Why doesn't he let her have her turn? It's so like the men of our generation. He's out to sabotage her."  

She's not the first to notice how, in the name of support, Bill continues to undermine and dominate his wife. The New York Times ran a rather snide story in May 2006 about the Clintons' marriage: " Mr. Clinton is rarely without company in public, yet the company he keeps rarely includes his wife . . ." That portrait of a long-distance-by-choice marriage was discussed in the media ad nauseum, especially (with glee) by Fox News.

But even the worst insinuations in that piece weren't as bad as the truth: they have an absolutely typical Boomer union, a rickety first-generation prototype of the modern marriage. They were early adopters of this "equal partnership" thing, so while they deserve all credit for having pioneered, their marriage is the romantic equivalent of the Apple IIe.

Bill Clinton epitomizes the men of his generation: unable to share the spotlight.

The Boomer marriage has a lot of things that got phased out in later development: male entitlement, female determination, resentment on both sides. They're trying hard to be good at mutual respect and encouragement, but there's only so far you can upgrade an old machine.

So the Clintons proclaim and demonstrate their love, convincingly: "No one understands me better and no one can make me laugh the way Bill does," she wrote in her 2003 memoir. "He's so romantic!" she coos to Essence. He kisses her on the forehead. They hug. I totally buy it. And then, like clockwork, he screws her over. Most recently, he says the thing about Jesse Jackson that turns off who knows how many supporters. She seethes, re-asserts her independence. They make up. Rinse and repeat.

Bill epitomizes the men of his generation: narcissistic, unable to share the spotlight, pulling the rug out from under her at every opportunity, but not malicious, never malicious. So she stays with him because she loves him, because he has a good heart. He stays with her because she'll have him. And so they go on like this, and will probably until they die. It's sort of sweet, sort of depressing.

Contrast that with the Obamas.


     

  

Commentarium (8 Comments)

Feb 04 08 - 4:38pm
AT

I agree with you 100% on your assessment of these two high-profile couples. We should not overlook the crucial role positive marriages play in helping to shape and influence billions of onlookers worldwide. Mr. and Mrs. Obama certainly provide a fresh CHANGE, as we finally can actually look up to, and admire a First Couple, both on and off the political circuit.

Feb 04 08 - 4:53pm
stj

Very interesting. I don't have much of a grasp of the Obama's marriage but I do think Billary are well described as "like two strong Oxen yoked together, sometimes pulling in different directions."

Feb 04 08 - 6:02pm
mm

Since in the Obama marriage, he's the "public figure", there's very little here to compare...in my experience, men in their 40s are not measurably less sexist than men in their 50s and 60s, when it comes to being asked to take on the conventionally "female" role of support to a high-powered spouse.
If Mrs. Obama were expecting her husband to shine a bit less brightly for a time in order to further her career, would things really be any different? Doubt it.

And anyone making their voting decisions based on this kind of shallow observation, rather than the candidates' stands on issues, is no better than the many fools who voted for GWB because he seemed so much more "likable" than Al Gore.

Feb 04 08 - 7:43pm
DAD

I'd like to echo mm's opinion. It's easy for things to seem gracious and at ease when traditional roles are being undertaken (despite Ms. Obama being a high powered lawyer, she's still in the traditionally female 'supportive' position); it's a whole different ball of wax when the female partner is the one in power and in my experience younger men handle this no more gracefully than their older counterparts, despite changes in the political correctness of such things. (I'm a 44 year old woman whose last two partners have been 44 and 29 and I can tell you that the 29 year old is *much* more controlling and undermining than the equal-aged gentleman was, all other things being equal.) Your assessment makes rather smug and sweeping generalizations and sells the Boomers short - some of the most *truly* egalitarian marriages I know are among people in their 50s and 60s and often that comes after the menopause, the children have left the nest, and both partners have the chance to grow as people. I also agree that assessing marriage health is a superficial and crappy way to pick a candidate for president, the train wreck that is Guiliani notwithstanding :).

Feb 05 08 - 10:34pm
RL

While the evidence clearly shows Bill undermining Hillary, I find the comparable "perfection" of the Obama marriage just like everything else about him: Exactly as his supporters can dream it to be-- yet lacking in any objective evidence.

Feb 07 08 - 5:47pm
LMS

Another couple that seemed to have a bitterness free marriage: George and Laura Bush. When how capable a man is of loving his (support role) wife stop being a tactic used to play on the emotions of voters and lure the ahem, domestic female, support, THAT will be progress. I am not voting for either Michelle OR Bill...for me, its between Barack and Hillary. Thats whats on my ballot. Call me old fashioned.

Feb 07 08 - 7:27pm
aw

Maybe the Obama's marriage seems nicer and filled with love because it is. The Clintons is based on political opportunity and a quest for power. Hillary is a lesbian. Bill likes women. The two don't make a marriage that will work. No matter how much they would like us to believe they are a "couple", it is obvious that they are not. A country's leaders should be ones that give us something to look up to, to emulate, and I see none of that with the Clinton's. Who would want a pretend marriage built on lies, deceipt and trying to show the public that you are something you are not. I'll take the Obamas over the fake Clintons anyday.

Feb 09 08 - 7:40am
msb

"Those of us who take issue with the Boomers' rickety marriages

Now you say something

Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: