Commentarium (9 Comments)

Apr 16 07 - 7:33pm
D.W.

OK, fine - very direct, but why is the lighting the very reverse of flattering? I've seen better lighting and light quality in subway and police stations. I'm sure it's a choice, but why bother with such an inexhaustable subject when you're going to ignore making photos that are remarkable for level of quality instead of nudity of model? Cold, clinical and asexual light - yeah, that's not working.
I've also seen better imagery involving the 'worst' photos of Ms Lunch, who speaks so highly of this work. Well, as Kern's an obvious inlfluence on this, but why not Helmut Newton, if only for the lighting?

Oct 24 03 - 9:31pm
FYI

Lydia Lunch is Featured in Dave's first book "Lust Circus"

Oct 24 03 - 3:12pm
sls

Nice connection between intimacy, personal comfort zone and the strength of openly being sexual.

Oct 24 03 - 2:52pm
GP

Great to see punk rock goddess Lydia Lunch writing for you!!!

You should try to see if someone could SHOOT HER; she's HOT, and BEAUTIFUL and was a NERVE-type MODEL before you all even had site!!!!

Oct 22 03 - 12:30pm
bw

"These photos demand a rebellious return to worshipping the real power of real women..."? Please! These photos are simply silly.

Oct 18 03 - 3:54pm
jmj

It's the white cotton that makes them look younger and me feel like a perv for looking. When they are spread-eagled with their ass and ...... exposed I'm not shamed. Then it's just another cheese pose. More technicolor junk posing as art from Nerve.

Oct 17 03 - 9:54pm
mk

Anyone else share the opinion that some of these girls look frighteningly YOUNG?

Oct 17 03 - 7:38pm
J.N.

Cute girls in non-obvious poses and no make up. Well executed!

Oct 18 03 - 12:48am
stj

hey, i like it. too much headscratching and you'll end up with a bald spot -- this works on a visceral level. keep up the range.