To IMP -- What does it mean for a vagina to "almost look fake"? ???? Excuse me??? These are VAGINAS that are part of INDIVIDUALS. Do you ever see a FACE that "almost looks fake"?
No, it does quite look like Whitkin, I agree. And a bit like Saudek. Only not quite as good as either. It's not bad. It's just, if I want Whitkin or Saudek, I'll go straight to the source.
Why is it that the only conclusion you can make is to compare it to Joel Peter Witkins work? In addition, why is it that you felt so compelled to share such a worthless comment?
Oh, I get it! It's because you're an idiot.
Commentarium (11 Comments)
Love these!
wow, congrats nerve on making a premium choice!
These pictures suck. They look like a proctologist shot them. The "Torn Stocking" thing is over too. It has been beaten to death.
To IMP -- What does it mean for a vagina to "almost look fake"? ???? Excuse me??? These are VAGINAS that are part of INDIVIDUALS. Do you ever see a FACE that "almost looks fake"?
imaginative and interesting. This is a start I hope to better art @ Nerve.
Fabulous...congratulations...original. Is photigrapher a man or woman?
first...it's witkin, not wHitkin. second, if you "idiots" ever looked at any of witkins work, you would see the similarity.
No, it does quite look like Whitkin, I agree. And a bit like Saudek. Only not quite as good as either. It's not bad. It's just, if I want Whitkin or Saudek, I'll go straight to the source.
Why is it that the only conclusion you can make is to compare it to Joel Peter Witkins work? In addition, why is it that you felt so compelled to share such a worthless comment?
Oh, I get it! It's because you're an idiot.
Sinister. Compelling. Erotic.
With a touch of Bellocq thrown in.
Bizar. byutiful THINGS rong but rite..................
I M fascinated.