Commentarium (14 Comments)

Jun 01 04 - 11:48pm
RAR

Your cleverness ferments meat without the need of oxygen.

May 31 04 - 4:32pm
MS

An insect on the ledge peering Vasconcelos, a plunge, a mystery, the distorted ruin, teeth like fangs, and black hair like oil. The character in A Mid Summer Night

May 30 04 - 6:16pm

I think the blurryiness is trying to capture motion, and I appreaciate the effort. If they had no sense of motion, they might just look like porn, and would not hold my attention. Good effort. Brian.

May 30 04 - 2:53pm
RAR

A few of the shots are sexy or inspiring, but in my mind the problem with the blurriness is that it is mostly camera shake, not motion blurriness from the couple. (This is evidenced by the whole scene being blurred vice just the areas that are moving.) I much prefer the use of blur by another Canadian photographer, Philippe Guillaume. See his use of blur in "Jess and Matt."

May 29 04 - 10:39pm

wow, i agree with the last. i'm glad the couple is doing well, but i fail to see how anything they're doing is mind-blowing. and the blurriness really makes me feel like i do when i'm carsick.

May 29 04 - 7:31pm
afs

My eyes are about to fall out of my head from bordom. These are just ridiculous and poorly executed.

May 29 04 - 6:36pm
TJ

The concept is nice--married people can still have mind-blowing sex--even if everyone has already heard it. Unfortunately, the whole idea can't really be expressed visually. As a result, this is just another generic shoot of two people having sex.

May 29 04 - 5:56am
mmm

Blury photos of a couple "having sex" isn't sexy or good photography, it's just annoying to look at.

May 29 04 - 12:37pm
jmj

not into this at all. the concept is right, the execution is flawed.

May 28 04 - 4:26pm
am

Perhaps masturbator is right. Not much action. The photos are surreal, as if in a dream. Good work. I'll give a 6 in a 1 to 10 scale

May 28 04 - 3:03pm
AI

Finally, normal looking people having fun together. This is a nice set of erotically-charged images. Excellent stuff. More like this please!

May 29 04 - 12:05am
P.C.

I can't believe these two have had responded thus far. Your'e kidding me.
Why don't you just use this exhibit as something "explored" and not necessarily a vehicle for you to "get-off" too. If you are so preoccupied with masterbating to these photo essays, exhibits, maybe you should be looking elsewhere for your entertainment.

As far as photo project, this is a great exploration into a couple's life. It has plenty of voyueristic allure, knowing that this couple...wait a minute..you probably didnt read the article..you were there to masterbate.

yikes.

May 29 04 - 12:02am
ge

Yowsas - real couple having real sex, and it looks real hot...I need a cold shower...

May 28 04 - 12:39pm
mstb

OK. The couple looks like they were having fun, but there's not much fun here for the voyeur/masturbator. The problem is that still photos do not capture motion, so the gimmicky effort to capture the motion of sex fails in these photos--to be specific, this effort produces quite blurry and really bad photos. Ughh. Really amateurish.