Why is everybody so judgmental about this woman. She has made personal choices about her appearance and that is none of our business. So she doesn't fit into everybodys idea of fantasy... but who does. Personally I am more attracted to a more natrual body type, but this woman is a phenomena! She is larger than life, a superheroine of sorts. That's what makes her a porn star.
my two cents: ok, it's interesting that she did that, and she most likely did it cos 1. it made money and fame, and 2. (maybe) she was turned on by the idea... kinda like cleopatra! ;)
as for its impact on me? dunno. real love and passion made me make love 10 times a day. great performance? not impressive? who cares, it FELT great, and that's what counts when *i* have sex. but i still found it interesting to watch a bit of houston's 620 video! LOL
yes, this woman is disgusting. the fact that she and her gang banging ritual are even a topic of any import is amazing. to deny all subtlelty in attraction and the human physique, is to deny the way desire weaves itself around us as individuals, as a collective.
carla
My comment on the "tameness" of the images had to do with the requirement to log in with a password, not that these should necessarily be more explicit. The log-in feature ordinarily is required when the images are a bit more explicit than these. The attractiveness or lack thereof in this subject is another issue, not addressed by my post.
Beauty does have "to do " with images, especially of a figure of sexual fantasy, at least to the extent that comment on it is reasonable and expected.
As far as her feat of endurance goes, that's all presented in the text, not the pics.
That's another story....
so the only reasons that are put forward for disliking the piece are: shes not god looking; the images are too tame. whats beauty got to do with it...there are many images in nerve of people that idon't find attractive (but then i don't know them...maybe i have everthing in common with them and who knows what can lead from theat)-to discard a piece just because the subject is 'unattractive' kinda narrows things down...and too tame...to judge work purely on its explicitness would mean diregarding a large amount of the work contained on nerve.
with a little bit of focousing she could be the new Orlan.
and lets face it how many men would be comfortable with a woman who can fuck hundreds of men in a one go-kinda makes there own abliity to indulge in sexual activities rather tame/lax/underwelming...
more interesting than some of the recent galleries put up
I agree. She's thin with fake tits... Is this supposed to turn me on? HELL NO! Give me a REAL woman with a nice curvy body and a pretty face. That's what it takes
I see nothing in this photographic display that would require use of the "nervecenter" log on. The images are tame at best. Is it then the commentary that is so controversial?
As a guy, I have to say she's fucking gross. The tight stomach is nice but not necessary, the tits look like they're painful and the face... yech! I saw her on E! a while ago when she looked a little less "used". But even back then she was no prize. Next time you guys do a feature on a pornstar, how about a pretty one, like Devon?
Commentarium (19 Comments)
Why is everybody so judgmental about this woman. She has made personal choices about her appearance and that is none of our business. So she doesn't fit into everybodys idea of fantasy... but who does. Personally I am more attracted to a more natrual body type, but this woman is a phenomena! She is larger than life, a superheroine of sorts. That's what makes her a porn star.
mdc, that's giving her too much credit. i've seen many interviews with her and she is not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
i love the way she looks i will take you any time love.
I think she colors her hair too! The Bitch!!!
i really liked the last photo
the curve and shadowing made for a
real prominent picture
thanx
Fake tits. Tired.
To quote Austin Powers: "That's a man, baby!" Pretty scary...
cleopatra? Why dont you talk about katherine the great. Dont pull african queens into this bullshit.
i'm wondering about her "John" tattoo... is that a real person, or is it (more likely) the generic term for a prostitute's customer?
my two cents: ok, it's interesting that she did that, and she most likely did it cos 1. it made money and fame, and 2. (maybe) she was turned on by the idea... kinda like cleopatra! ;)
as for its impact on me? dunno. real love and passion made me make love 10 times a day. great performance? not impressive? who cares, it FELT great, and that's what counts when *i* have sex. but i still found it interesting to watch a bit of houston's 620 video! LOL
yes, this woman is disgusting. the fact that she and her gang banging ritual are even a topic of any import is amazing. to deny all subtlelty in attraction and the human physique, is to deny the way desire weaves itself around us as individuals, as a collective.
carla
My comment on the "tameness" of the images had to do with the requirement to log in with a password, not that these should necessarily be more explicit. The log-in feature ordinarily is required when the images are a bit more explicit than these. The attractiveness or lack thereof in this subject is another issue, not addressed by my post.
Beauty does have "to do " with images, especially of a figure of sexual fantasy, at least to the extent that comment on it is reasonable and expected.
As far as her feat of endurance goes, that's all presented in the text, not the pics.
That's another story....
so the only reasons that are put forward for disliking the piece are: shes not god looking; the images are too tame. whats beauty got to do with it...there are many images in nerve of people that idon't find attractive (but then i don't know them...maybe i have everthing in common with them and who knows what can lead from theat)-to discard a piece just because the subject is 'unattractive' kinda narrows things down...and too tame...to judge work purely on its explicitness would mean diregarding a large amount of the work contained on nerve.
with a little bit of focousing she could be the new Orlan.
and lets face it how many men would be comfortable with a woman who can fuck hundreds of men in a one go-kinda makes there own abliity to indulge in sexual activities rather tame/lax/underwelming...
more interesting than some of the recent galleries put up
Wow.
What a freak.
From the waist down she looks great, but waist up, she's repulsive.
Her face is goulish.
Very little beauty or sex appeal here.
I agree. She's thin with fake tits... Is this supposed to turn me on? HELL NO! Give me a REAL woman with a nice curvy body and a pretty face. That's what it takes
I see nothing in this photographic display that would require use of the "nervecenter" log on. The images are tame at best. Is it then the commentary that is so controversial?
As a guy, I have to say she's fucking gross. The tight stomach is nice but not necessary, the tits look like they're painful and the face... yech! I saw her on E! a while ago when she looked a little less "used". But even back then she was no prize. Next time you guys do a feature on a pornstar, how about a pretty one, like Devon?
Thank goodness you're out there Jack, and others like you. Cause if I have to look like this to get any or even be a part of someone's fantasy. EWW.