Not a member? Sign up now
At Long Last, Britney Spears Is Topless
By Brian FairbanksJune 8th, 2009, 10:25 amComments (13)
If we never put up another post again, we will have officially ended at a peak level of cultural importance: Britney Spears has posed naked for photos, and we obtained them.
Seriously, though, did you really want to see these? After you discover that she has a big-ass tat on each boob, almost obscuring her nipples, you may regret those leanings.
[gallery columns="2"]
What do you think-- real or fake? The photos, that is. (After all, since when did her low-cut tops ever reveal the point tips of her, uh, star tattoos?)
Commentarium (13 Comments)
Fake.
Um, yeah, these are fake and pretty bad fakes at that.
definitely fake.
[...] And the really NSFW ones at Nerve! [...]
I dont't those are tattoos they look like body paint.
How have people never seen these before these are screen shots from the original version of the video that i had before the final 1 was released. old news lol
[...] And the really NSFW ones at Nerve! [...]
I always thought the "brown starfish" was found at the other end?
Also...I bet those are make-up appliques around her wonky nipples.
However.....Thank Goodness.......at last!!!
Look like henna artwork to me. Wife's small cousins just came back from Disneyland with henna artwork (on their ankles).
[...] we published explosive topless photos of Britney Spears and the reaction was immediate: “What? These are obviously [...]
I want to be a star-boobied-sneetch too! Where can I get mine done?!
I dont remember her having a tattoo of a snake or whatever that is on her forearm... I say... FAKE
Actually, everyone, they are apparently real... those are temporary tattoos, according to the photographer who claims to have taken the snaps:
Click here.
Now you say something