Not a member? Sign up now
David Foster Wallace's Undergrad Thesis Is Getting Its Own Book
By Lindsay CutlerMay 28th, 2010, 12:35 pmComments (5)
It was originally called "Richard Taylor's 'Fatalism' and the Semantics of Physical Modality" but the new, much easier to understand title is Fate, Time and Language: An Essay On Free Will. Hooray if you love discovering new DFW works to scour over, and boo if you think this is some invasion of posthumous privacy which he was super guarded about while alive, anyway. The same goes for his unfinished manuscript The Pale King which comes out sometime later next year and even more so with David Lipsky's book Although Of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself: A Road Trip With David Foster Wallace in which Lipsky follows DFW at the end of his Infinite Jest book tour. Even though I suspect it might make Wallace uncomfortable to know there's a book that documents what he eats in restaurants, it's supposed to be amazing and I still have to read it, regardless of how I can only guess DFW would feel about it were he alive today. It's hard to separate your respect for a writer's wishes - what you think he may have preferred you know or not know - when, like most of his fans, you want to know as much as you can about the man.









Commentarium (5 Comments)
I think at a certain point the art belongs to the society. Unless the act of guarding the privacy itself is the art. I just game myself a headache.
At a certain point, art does belong to society, but it does seem wrong to be publishing the works of a very private man, which he did not want to be published. If a few more years separated us from his death, I could see this being OK. Of course, then fewer people would be interested, and the publishing companies would have less of an incentive to be publishing his works posthumously.
Of course art belongs to society at a certain point. In our society, that point is 75 years after the creator's death or whenever the copyright holder donates it to the public domain. Until then, it belongs to whoever owns it. If I'm not mistaken, theses are considered works-for-hire and are the property of the institution for which they were written.
I know everybody loves the shit out of this guy, but, isn't this just 'taking a joke too far'?
That's way more clever than I was expetcing. Thanks!