|
|
|
 |
f
you
consider the tale of a teenage girl fucking a married man in the
ass with a vinyl dildo a raunchy one, then Melissa Panarello, author of 100
Strokes of the
Brush Before Bed (translated from Italian
by
Lawrence Venuti), has written a veritably raunchy book. The facts that
it's an "autobiographical novel" and the Italian author is barely
eighteen have elevated 100 Strokes to an international
scandal and commercial success: more than 700,000 copies have been sold in
Italy alone.
Her critics take personal affront at Panarello's raw discussions of underage
sexuality — blindfolded
group sex, simulated rape — while her advocates (like, um, this month's Teen
Vogue) praise her courage and honesty.
Nerve recently spoke with the book world's "it" girl of iniquity
and found out that she's as un-interested in being the courageous, honest Voice
of a Generation as she is in being the next European Wurtzel or Fielding — young,
erudite, emotionally diseased and proud of it. In fact, Panarello was more poised
than prurient, not exactly the girl in heat she shamelessly describes in her work. — Carrie Hill Wilner
Is your age more controversial than your material?
Obviously. Erotic books come out all the time, but not that many cause
controversy or sell a lot of copies. At least in my opinion, the material in
itself isn't really scandalous, and I think the scandal in other people's
opinion is that this is coming from a young girl. It's an autobiographical
novel written
in the form of the diary of Melissa P., my alter ego, recounting this series
of sort of degrading sexual experiences
she has through the age of sixteen. And well, teenagers having and talking
about extreme sexual experiences will always cause controversy.
Do you think there's a valid distinction between "erotic literature" and literature proper, and do you consider yourself a writer of erotica?
I understand the distinction, and I enjoy reading what I consider erotic
literature, but I don't particularly relate to what it represents. I'd
describe my book as about growing up in a dangerous world.
Should Melissa's
behavior shock and upset people, or is it within the normal range?
It's definitely not normal. But I consider the most scandalous thing the fact
that the book is [considered] scandalous. It bespeaks a real sort of close-mindedness
that this sort of discussion is still considered out of line.
What about the critics who use this as an excuse to lament the general
downfall of Modern Youth? Do you think there are elements of Melissa's experience
that
reflect a more widespread sexual reality?
I find the suggestion that I'd speak for a whole generation pretty ridiculous.
In the same way you can't suggest there's one book that speaks for the whole
adult world, you can't say a book speaks to or reflects the adolescent experience.
That certainly wasn't my intention.
Every mildly scandalous artifact of youth culture is held up as an example
of how we're all going to hell. Why do you think people are so eager to find
these messages and generalizations?
I don't know, it can be partially explained as arrogance, and as people diagnosing
others as degenerates so that they can feel good about themselves. And no one
ever thinks carefully about what's going on in the larger world that precipitates
this behavior they find so shocking. No one makes an effort to understand who
we are and why we do what we do, only to criticize those actions.
Maybe they're just jealous.
I could see that. I don't know, it seems so many people just don't have the tools
to relate to young people, I don't know why, and that seems very scary to them.
Jealousy, yes, but also incompetence.
Ideally, how would your book be received?
For one, people would look more at the book itself, instead of this fixation with everything around it.
One thing that's unavoidable but sort of annoying when you write about
your own sexuality is that there will be a subset of readers who will use your
writing as pornography — what are your feelings about that?
I don't know, seeing as I often read erotic comics or erotic books simply to
be turned on. I've never really thought of that response as anything but human
nature.
Reading 100 Strokes can be both very jarring and a turn-on — were
there parts that were upsetting or arousing for you to write?
Not really. There weren't many emotions involved in the moment [I was writing].
I was
more
trying
to
understand.
Was it entirely based on your own experience?
A lot is real, some is fantasy, but I consider it autobiographical because it's
very much where I was at that time. In that sense, it's a faithful account.
Why did you decide on a diary format?
My publisher and I spoke about doing a regular novel, but it didn't really work,
there's not much plot.
Despite the risqué content and non-traditional structure of
the book, it follows a traditional narrative in terms of the bad girl
meets
good boy and is saved by love storyline. Why
rely
on
that?
I was encouraged to make the ending darker, but in the end I really consider
the narrative a sort of a fairy tale, and I think it works.
There's
a scene in the book where Melissa's mother uses a fairy
tale to help Melissa learn from her experiences. Do you think
that moral lesson is at the center of 100 Strokes as well, or is it
just an aspect of Melissa's experience?
I definitely think the lesson of that fable is relevant to the book, and to my
experience. It's not incidental.
How did people around you react to the book?
My parents weren't thrilled. They didn't want me to publish it at first, though
they've come to understand its importance and necessity to me. My friends quite
liked it; I'd read them passages for editing as I was writing. My professors
reacted poorly, but I left school, so that doesn't really matter.
Do you get a lot of creepy fan mail?
Strangely enough, considering the success of the book, I haven't gotten much
of that. I got some strange email from one couple, but it's
really more degrading to them than it is to myself. The few times it's happened,
I've just laughed it off.
You were talking earlier about your own experience with erotic literature, can you tell me about the first pieces you found particularly interesting, or that influenced your writing?
Well, it wasn't really an everyone's-doing-it-so-I-can-too that prompted me
to write this. I probably would have done it had I not been exposed to any
erotic
literature. I can't think of anything specific that opened up my mind.
Still, writing something like this requires quite a bit of courage. Where do
you think you get those resources from?
It's flattering that you say that but I never relied on any big swell of courage,
it was a pretty normal process for me, and I didn't really anticipate the reaction,
one way or the other. It was just a part of my daily life, it was pretty easy.
Courage doesn't have that much to do with writing.
Italy's had a pretty strong tradition of very young writers over the
past few decades; there's no real parallel in the States. Do you see yourself
in this tradition?
I prefer to think in global terms, and in that sense, I do see myself as part
of a general tendency. There are a lot of very young people writing about what
they know in a very autobiographical manner, a lot of young Japanese writers,
then you have JT Leroy, for example. I think we're really witnessing a new
movement that's global. That's the level at which these things are happening,
and that's
the context I see myself in, more than a national context.
Where do you think that energy is coming from, that this is happening
right now?
I don't know, probably now more than ever, we're totally alienated from our
surroundings, or rather, there's this world we don't want to belong
to, and so people are examining themselves. It's
a crisis we're all living right now.
n°
Read an excerpt from 100 Strokes here.
©2004 Nerve.com.
|
|