promotion

I f you believe, as many do, that Jesus is always with you, then that means he was with you that time you made out with that guy in a bar bathroom.
    Perhaps Jesus even called in the favor for you, for as Will Roscoe asserts in his book, Jesus and the Shamanic Tradition of Same-Sex Love, the son of God had something of a weakness for cute, young boys himself. The difference is that Jesus grew up before the '80s really happened, before something we came to call "identity politics" burst into vogue. As a result, Christ was never given his gay due, and contemporary Christianity remains thoroughly square.
    According to a letter allegedly written around the year 200 A.D. and discovered in a monastery outside of Jerusalem in 1958, there exists a Christian text called the Secret Gospel of Mark. If believed, this text offers evidence that Jesus Christ engaged in intimate same-sex contact, and perhaps even intercourse, with young men to provide them the momentary sensation of rocketing toward the kingdom of heaven.
    Two thousand years later, gay boys are still searching for the man who can provide them a similar service, and Roscoe says it's possible, even in our steely, sin-choked modern world — if we know where to look. Let us pray. — Will Doig
I understand you have a degree in History of Consciousness. What is that?
It's an interdisciplinary cultural studies theory program at UC-Santa Cruz.
But what is that?
I have no idea. It was something they called it when they created it back in the '70s, back when Santa Cruz was more Marxist. By the time I got there, it was more Lacanian feminist. It was all about the lesbian phallus.
Do you come from a religious background?
I'm Catholic. It was my mom's religion, something important to her that she wanted to impart to me, but she also realized that after I was confirmed, it was my choice. It probably broke her heart to see that I wasn't very religious after that.
But you're obviously very interested in religion. Why did you flee the Catholic Church?
It was the '60s after Vatican II. Inculcation to the church was very lightweight. I was already reading things about the Inquisition and whatnot and I thought to myself, "What a horrible institution," and that was the end of that. But I still have that Catholic feeling without the institution part.
They're separable?
Any idiot could read the Bible and figure out what it means. Historically, Catholicism never emphasized reading the Bible. The popes and the priests did the reading. And then Protestantism was all about translating the Bible into English, people saying that we don't need popes and priests and all the corruption that goes with them, we'll just interpret it ourselves. So we started reading it ourselves and now look what we've got.
So you've read the entire Bible, then?
I certainly have not.
Your book alleges that Jesus Christ engaged in physical intimacy with other men. Just to clarify, we're talking about anal sex here?
At a certain point, I don't think it was necessarily thought of as sexual at all. It was simply a magical technique that involved intimacy and no one was expected to be erotically aroused. But what I personally allow is, if there was sexual intimacy, and it was all about transferring a spirit from one body to another, then what would be more symbolic of that transfer than for one body to be connected to another, and perhaps even exchange bodily fluids?
Could they also have been having sex just for pleasure?
All of the references to kissing and naked contact, it certainly is suggestive. But the bottom line is that that's not what this was about. It's about a magical procedure in which Jesus was able to have a spirit possess him and transfer it to another person so that they could experience what Jesus experiences, which is to be a god and go to heaven.
How old was Jesus while all this was going on? Youngish?
As far as we know, he was in his early thirties at the time of his ministry. The men that he was with were referred to as neaniskos, or youth. That term is unique to the Secret Gospel of Mark. That's what's so wacky about this discovery, and why no one ever talks about it.
Perhaps people truly believe that the Secret Gospel is a fake.
A consensus among New Testament scholars has developed that the Secret Gospel is authentic, that it's not a forgery. They accept it but they don't ever talk about it.
But why not? What would be the harm in admitting that there is now evidence that Jesus had same-sex lovers? Is it all politics?
Oh please. They're certainly not going to accept this material. Not only does it redefine Christianity and the role of same-sex love in the Christian tradition, but it also shows Jesus to be a figure in magical practices. It disrupts everything.
Sex and religion have always been intertwined. Great sex is even called "a religious experience." How do you think sex and religion got so wrapped up in each other in the first place?
Sex is one of the last remaining realms in which ecstasy can occur in the secular life in the modern world, in which we have a sense of being beyond ourselves. The intensity of being in love, of hot sex, of orgasm — it's the most intense thing we experience, with the possible exception of childbirth for women. I think that's why sex is the last refuge of the primal emotion in our culture.
Can it bring one closer to God?
Based on what I've learned, yes. If praying seems lame to you, and if you pursue your desire in a conscious way, it can be a path for your own self-realization. And I'm also suggesting that, in this way, you can pursue your spirituality if you're a queer person. I'm suggesting that we're never closer to God than when we love, and by loving passionately, expansively, foolishly, we bring ourselves into the age-old tradition of same-sex love.
If all of this is really true, why has the Church zeroed in on homosexuality as Sin No. 1?
It's all about uniting against a boogeyman figure. For average folks in Middle America, their own identities and meaning in life are so tenuous, this represents the chance to feel that they're smugly on the side of good. They can think to themselves, "I've divorced five times and cheated on my wives, but at least I'm not one of those." And it's been going on for ages. The Puritans arrived here in this vast forest and thought it was filled with the devil, when what they meant was that it was filled with American Indians. Women who became hysterical were "possessed by witches." It covers up the fact that the people who are pointing the finger are simply not living a Christian life in any way, shape or form.
It's a conspiracy!
The thing is, for Americans to accept a minority, an "other," they have to think of that "other" as being just like them. When we urge acceptance of women, we say that women are just like men. When we urge acceptance of gays, we say that gays are just like straights.
Even Paul says that a man should love his wife as he loves his own flesh. The mystical extension of that is that one should become androgynous. There's a strong Christian tradition of androgyny. In heaven, there is no male or female. To get to that place, you need to get rid of gender. You need to castrate yourself. Mind you, I'm not advising this at all, this Christian approach to abstinence. There are those who will argue that you're looking for a way to "get God" without having to deal with the bigotry of the institutional Church. That this is all New Age hooey.
Nobody more than I thinks that what I'm saying sounds wacky. I tried very hard to position all of this as just a story. I'm starting out telling a good story to get people to suspend their judgment a little, and then I start mounting up the evidence. I didn't know where it was going. This project unfolded over the course of seven years, two boyfriends, four horrible jobs and two cars totaled. It's a very personal thing that I had to write, and it became about me sharing what I learned during the AIDS epidemic, and that's that love is all that there is time for. And I never would have thought that contemporary gays could be connected to this tradition until I saw what we could do to be connected to each other. It's a love between lovers, but it's just as much a love between friends. We have sex with each other, but we also have these very special, intimately same-sex friendships. Just like Jesus.





To buy Jesus and the Shamanic Tradtion of Same-Sex Love, click here.


©2005 Will Doig and Nerve.com.

Commentarium (10 Comments)

Apr 19 05 - 8:45am
SDW

Upcoming in the Michael Jackson trial- Jacko claims Christ has instructed him to have young boy sleepovers to fulfill the precedent He set in the Secret Gospel of Mark.

Sabra Wineteer

Apr 19 05 - 1:35pm
JOM

Oh please, gay artists and authors always pick on religions to stir up controversy to bring attention to themselves or their art. This is just another lame attempt by a talentless gay author. If its not the painting "Piss Christ" of feces on a staue of the Virgin Mary its crap like this. I'm not even religious, but how about showing some respect to those that are and not desecrating their beliefs. Everyones beliefs deserve respect even if they are not your own.

Apr 19 05 - 5:46pm
fu2

I agree. This and Steve Almond's stupid and profane attempt at being edgy (or whatever) whiffs of lame-ass soft-gay-porn. Yawn. Nerve, you've got some really good writers - occasionally. Why did you stop at this junk?

Apr 20 05 - 1:50am
dm

"Morton Smith, followed by Crossan, Koester, and others, has argued that the Secret Gospel of Mark was a source of canonical Mark's narrative. This position, though, is untenable. First, despite the modern consensus, the possibility that the letter is a modern forgery from the eighteenth century has not been completely excluded. Second, Clement is often unreliable in his use of sources, and so even if his letter is authentic, this does not mean that what he says about the Secret Gospel of Mark is correct. Third, what we have of this document is highly fragmentary. Fourth, no consensus exists among those who see this document as a source of Mark." Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the Secret Gospel of Mark, if it existed at all, was a source of canonical Mark. Smith's efforts to reconstruct the history of early Christianity on this uncertain foundation, arguing that a sexually libertine, magic-working Jesus was reinterpreted in later canonical Gospel tradition, is correctly regarded by the vast majority of scholars as pure fantasy." [Robert E. Van Voorst, Jesus Outside the New Testament (Eerdmans:2000), p.211]

Apr 20 05 - 6:32am
JAD

I think it is interesting how negative all the feedback about this article is! While I agree that the legitimacy of the Secret Book of Mark should be questioned, is it that upsetting to see Jesus or Christianity portrayed in a new way? I also find it unlikely that Jesus used same-sex intercourse as a means of worship, but I would still be interested in actually reading what this author has to say about it before writing it off as "disrespectful" or an "attack" on Christianity. Did you people think you were visiting the Focus on the Family website or something!?

Apr 22 05 - 4:04am
SLS

I think it's as legitimate an interpretation of the life of the person called Jesus as any. Though I'm not a student of Druidic practices, it's a known fact that Christianity borrowed liberally from Druidic traditions and celebrations, I don't really consider it out of the bounds of reality to say that sexual rituals might have been used in early Christianity.
If you ask me, the evil perpetuated by the Christian church, the gross misinterpretations of the collected parables called the "holy" Bible is much more of an affront to any clear thinking person than the suggestion that Jesus liked to have sex with boys or girls.
The Bible isn't the word of god...it's what people have decided it is. If someone decides the Bible says God is a hippo in a pink tutu, it's no less relevant than what the two thousand years of scholars have decreed.
Really...if you think that saying Jesus liked having sex with men, or maybe didn't like it-just did it as magickal ritual...is sacrilege or debasing to others beliefs, that speaks more to your own prejudices.
It's literally unknowable and if it helps one person feel better about their existence on a tiny planet suspended in a vast and uncaring universe, then who cares?
I mean really...
And I honestly think the Bible has some nice things to say and that Jesus was a super guy with lots to teach but God is not in the sky, truth is not in a book and people do not have any answers except to say decide for yourself.
Positing as many explanations as possible can only help.

Apr 24 05 - 10:52am
BB

Perverted Trash!

Apr 25 05 - 1:25pm
S S

SECRET GOSPEL OF MARK may be a fake by scholar Morton Smith (see earlier post). If not, or even if so, this was meant to be a "gnostic" allegorical quasi-exoteric story. To Gnostics, whether or not Jesus the Nazerene ever existed was very much beside the point. A new documentary makes a very convincing case that he did not. see http://www.thegodmovie.com/ The message was in the mytheme as was also the case in many pagan cults.

Consider this gospel the gay sex version of early Christian tantra. Marcionites, Valentinians, Basilidians, Manicheans, and other Christian Gnostics each had a different path to experience transcendental mystic enlightenment. The Capocrateans used sexual rituals, but as far as I know, only
str8.

Apr 25 05 - 3:02pm
JB

The non-sense that gets tossed around as scholarship these days is beyond belief. This book relies heavily on

Jul 17 07 - 12:10am

This is more complete and utter bullshit that comes out from gay wanna-bes, attempting to "spiritualize" their state of entrapment in the phenomena of the world and lustful attachments. If you think that any master on the level of a christ would have a consciousness remotely resembling your lustful, attached, illusion-delusion based state, you're truly fucking mad!
Remember, to be truly two-spirit and spiritual, is to have sexuality not be a question at all. It has nothing to do with duality. I guess it really gets old to hear all this wanna-be "spritual" bullshit from unenlightend people who happen to be gay and think that by virtue of that fact alone, they are enlightened. When, in reality, they are far, far from it.

Now you say something

Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: