N've always liked Sandra Bullock. You have to admire her dual career as actor and producer, her attempts — I said attempts — to play strong female characters (hey, Miss Congeniality is a good feminist flick if you squint hard enough), and her willingness to make an ass of herself. So when she admitted on E!'s Revealed with Jules Asner that she was secretly obsessed with The Bachelor, I knew I'd found a kindred spirit.
     You know you've watched it too: ABC's car crash of a reality series in which one good-on-paper guy is surrounded by twenty-five self-hating women in desperate need of an engagement ring. The lucky bastard gets to take the girls on "fantasy dates,"then break their hearts, one by one, until he's settled on a potential bride. The entire process takes six weeks. (Actually an eternity in TV time, when you consider the show's forerunners: the live, two-hour special Who Wants to Marry a Millionaire? and the 1983 Brady Bunch reunion movie in which Marcia tied the knot with a man she'd only known for a week, hoping to one-up Jan again and beat her to the altar.) It's easy to be appalled by The Bachelor, and the way it preys on the desperation of women raised on traditional values, exaggerates the cattiness of female competition and turns its contestants into items on a cheap romance buffet. But it's also hard to turn away from.
     So, no doubt like Sandra, I eagerly awaited the premiere of The Bachelorette. This time around, the determinator is Trista Rehn, first runner-up on The Bachelor's premiere season. (Don't call it a comeback: viewers fell in love with the perky physical therapist, but Bachelor No. 1 picked the chick with fake boobs instead.) Apparently, national humiliation couldn't dissuade Trista from finding a husband by any means necessary, and now she's lining up twenty-five suckers for inspection.
     At first, I worried that the gender-role reversal wouldn't translate. What guy with half a brain would put himself up on the chopping block for one woman? And surely, male contestants wouldn't care enough about the process to create dramatic tension: there would be no over-analyzing, no malicious gossip, no tears.
     But, by Jove, it's working! After three episodes, The Bachelorette has matched — if not surpassed — The Bachelor in drama. The formula goes both ways — and provides a tidy little lesson about gender relations in the process. In a culture that's so invested in the men-from-Mars-women-from-Venus mindset, The Bachelorette proves how similar we really are.
     Take the show's first kiss, aggressively delivered by Trista herself. Alone with a date named Russell, she grabs his face and plants one on him — while he's trying to express his feelings. A day later, when Russell misinterprets the moment (he thinks it actually means something), Trista pulls him aside, explains that she isn't into aggressive guys and tells him to back off. When another date whines that Trista isn't getting to know him well enough, she blows him off. (Why waste time on someone so high maintenance when twenty-four other candidates are waiting outside?) It's irony on an Alanis level!
     Meanwhile, it's the men — not Trista — who spout all the romantic clichés: "I just need to hear her reciprocate those feelings for me." "I believe in love at first sight." "This was meant to be." When not emoting for the camera, the guys huddle around talking shit about each other. Several of them get teary-eyed when the ax falls.

promotion

Meanwhile, Trista continues cutting an oral swath through the remaining contestants. (In upcoming episodes, she's shown making out with multiple guys; unfortunately, though, not all at once.) It's surprising that network television has allowed America's Sweetheart to exhibit this kind of sexual aggressiveness and power, but for most of the women I know, this is as real as reality television has ever been. "Finally," said a friend and fellow Bachelor addict during the second episode, "a chick on this series with some balls."
     Interesting, The Bachelorette's nod to gender equality appears to be a trend. On MTV's Real World/Road Rules Battle of the Sexes, teams of men and women compete in a series of mental and physical challenges. What would seem to be a lesson in the differences between testosterone and estrogen has turned out to be a counterintuitive surprise: the women have won the first two challenges, the second of which was decidedly physical. The guys' Adonis-like physiques betray a level of body consciousness usually associated with women on TV, and they spend just as much time flaunting the goods. In the first episode, the men provided nearly all the high drama: when David (the emotionally unstable skinny dude from Real World: Los Angeles who got booted by his roommates) got into a heated argument with Puck (the emotionally unstable skinny dude from Real World: San Francisco who got booted by his roommates), their tiff ended in a puddle of tears. Yes, Puck actually cried.
     And then there's Joe Millionaire, a rip-off of a rip-off with a typically obnoxious Fox twist: Twenty women are flown to France to "fall in love" with the Conan the Barbarian-esque heir to a $50 million fortune. Later, they learn he's actually a construction worker who earns nineteen thou a year. It's Cinderella with a sex change! Although the show isn't short on gender stereotypes — the women are spoiled brats who want to be princesses; the guy is strong and, for all practical purposes, silent — the premise defies one of the most sexist assumptions of all: that men are supposed to be providers. Inside Joe, there's a poor little feminist screaming to get out. Admitting that he's looking for an "independent, resourceful woman" because he "won't be able to provide," the pseudomillionaire takes the ladies on "hard labor dates" — grape picking in the cold rain, coal shoveling on a train, manure slinging in the stables — to judge, in a sense, how masculine they can be.
     Reality shows are about as realistic as Joan Rivers' face is naturally taut. This has been proven. But this season's doozies are more true-to-life than any episode of Dawson's Creek, Sex and the City or The Mind of the Married Man. So much of pop culture is constructed on a clear-cut separation between the sexes that The Bachelorette and Joe Millionaire can actually teach us something. By giving people a little unscripted space to defy stereotypes — however unintentionally — they reveal the gender continuum we all exist on. Now, some macho meathead might catch an episode of The Bachelorette and realize that expressing a little emotion won't turn him gay. Preteen girls might see Trista in action and dream about asking for their lover's hand in marriage. Or they'll watch Joe Millionaire and decide to make their own millions instead of relying on someone else.
     Of course, this might mean the end of Baywatch, but that's the price you pay for evolution.  





©2003 Lorelei Sharkey and Nerve.com.




Commentarium (19 Comments)

Jan 28 03 - 6:01am
BLU

Thanks Lo, nice work! Weren't we all supposed to have gotten beyond those kinds of "programs" decades ago? Has N.O.W. fallen COMPLETELY asleep?

Jan 29 03 - 12:00am
znt

I can't help but feel the crying men from The Bachelorette are only setting themselves up in the future. Can we be so confident to say that women aren't suckers for the strong, sensitive man? Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I'm the one who's left in the evolutionary dust, but I feel that these crocodile tears are only a last second attempt at securing some action once they get sent back home.

Whether on television or back home, men in general, are not too particular about where they get "It".

...just my two cents. Great article, by the way.

Jan 28 03 - 1:07pm
MM

Awsome article with real criticisim

Jan 28 03 - 3:47pm
ELM

"Now, some macho meathead might catch an episode of The Bachelorette and realize
that expressing a little emotion won't turn him gay." - You say this as if the goal were to reach the point where you find out,
with relief, that we can be who we want without fearing turning gay, rather than not fearing gay-ness in itself. Please check your
underlying assumptions. logan

Jan 28 03 - 4:17pm
jk

why are men today such pussies? guys, repeat this to yourself every morning when you wake up, and again before you go to sleep at night: its NOT ok to be a pussy, its NOT ok to be a pussy! Just grow the f up, get into a fight, or join the marines or something. But stop being 'the bitch'.

Jan 28 03 - 5:49pm
DH

Nice article ... thanks. Well written, and I agree with you! (DH (a man))

Jan 29 03 - 10:23am
E.S.

Great article Lo! Please keep them coming...we need more women like you writing pieces like this. Thanks!

Jan 29 03 - 10:49am
MM

Liked the article and your writing. Thanks,

Jan 29 03 - 2:32pm
db

There is very little television more real than Mind of the Married Man. That was its fatal flaw: too much honesty. Executives cancelled it because it was "divisive" in households. Wives/girlfriends couldn't believe that men really were such pigs and guys (like me) we always on the defensive for being shown as such simplistic, selfish, hedonists at heart. It will be missed.

Jan 31 03 - 8:37pm
lj

Whatever. Would any of you ever think to TURN OFF THE TELEVISION and do something more constructive with your time? Please. The networks will stop airing these shows if you take it upon yourselves to stop watching them.

Feb 01 03 - 12:51pm
TS

I loved the article - never having seen any of these shows myself, I hear all the goss about them... From my boyfriend. He loves (apparently) to pay out the guys and the girls alike, try his hand at playing pyschiatrist and basically, any excuse to sit on the couch and stare at the one spot for hours on end is a good one. Which is the entire point of TV, right?

Feb 02 03 - 2:48pm
jj

Good piece. Captured my feelings about these shows, anyway. Television that's interesting precisely because it breaks gender stereotypes, despite the formulas supposedly adopting gender stereotypes. Basically because put real people together they'll probably surprise you. Luckily producers are getting smart enough to let that surprise happen, instead of trying to can it.
Jonathan Field
NYC

Feb 17 03 - 9:42pm
pp

this article is absolute post-modern brilliance, with a side of Madonna-esque culture-busting changes

Feb 20 03 - 2:46am
gm

I concur with you on the swarminess of most of the new reality shows, but to a guy like me, Joe Millionaire was more about the eagerness with which a lot of American woman out there, will degrade themselves for a shot at realizing the fantasy of Prince Charming coming along and picking them to be their Cinderella. Most of the contestants, had their fangs out and betrayed a common current of low self esteem. I realize that it would be hard on anyone of either sex to be put into this situation and still manage to show a lot of class in the process. At least the woman he ended up with seemed to take it pretty well, and displayed a lot of courage by sticking to her guns and playing it close to the vest. I admired her for not being a complete gold digger. Oh well, keep up the good work in your columns,I always enjoy your sass and attitude.

Oct 01 10 - 3:40pm
serialcoder

Respect to the author of original work. I am want to say thanks for funny post, and thanks to google and yahoo for perfect blog search.

Oct 03 10 - 10:36am
Patch Anna

As usual, tons of stupid comments. People, why are you writing in comments - good site, great article, thanks author?

Oct 19 10 - 7:57pm
serial crack

Lol, You wrote a big one.

Feb 09 11 - 6:11am
Rapidshare Deja

Intresting opinion and text, are you sure? is it really you point of view?.

Feb 17 11 - 11:02pm
clarissa

ha-ha-ha-ha! That is standart point of view, be more original!

Now you say something

Incorrect please try again
Enter the words above: Enter the numbers you hear: